Decision-making experiences and decisional regret in patients receiving implanted cardioverter-defibrillators

IF 1 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart and Mind Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4103/hm.hm_51_21
Idean Pourshams, Bryant Lin, Paul Wang, R. Stafford
{"title":"Decision-making experiences and decisional regret in patients receiving implanted cardioverter-defibrillators","authors":"Idean Pourshams, Bryant Lin, Paul Wang, R. Stafford","doi":"10.4103/hm.hm_51_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patient education before the placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is strongly recommended to prevent or mitigate feelings of regret and frustration in ICD recipients. Medicare guidelines for ICDs require a shared decision-making approach that focuses on patients' health goals, values, and preferences before implantation. However, many patients are not fully informed of what to expect when recovering from ICD placement or living with an ICD long-term. Objectives: Our objective is to understand decision-making processes and decisional regret in patients requiring ICDs using in-depth interviews. Methods: Nineteen patients at Stanford University Medical Center were recruited to participate in individual interviews using closed-ended and open-ended questions to engage dialogue. Notes taken during interviews were assessed and used to identify major themes. Results: Participants described a lack of adequate education about ICD postoperative recovery and long-term, postimplantation considerations such as avoiding electromagnetic fields, false-positive ICD shocks, and the esthetic effect of ICD implantation. In addition, feelings of fear and anxiety were prevalent in participants' recollections of accepting an ICD. Conclusion: Further improvement in patient education before ICD placement is needed. The decision-making process can be simplified and patient regret and frustration minimized by providing reliable information that is accessible and interactive.","PeriodicalId":34653,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Mind","volume":"6 1","pages":"32 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/hm.hm_51_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Patient education before the placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is strongly recommended to prevent or mitigate feelings of regret and frustration in ICD recipients. Medicare guidelines for ICDs require a shared decision-making approach that focuses on patients' health goals, values, and preferences before implantation. However, many patients are not fully informed of what to expect when recovering from ICD placement or living with an ICD long-term. Objectives: Our objective is to understand decision-making processes and decisional regret in patients requiring ICDs using in-depth interviews. Methods: Nineteen patients at Stanford University Medical Center were recruited to participate in individual interviews using closed-ended and open-ended questions to engage dialogue. Notes taken during interviews were assessed and used to identify major themes. Results: Participants described a lack of adequate education about ICD postoperative recovery and long-term, postimplantation considerations such as avoiding electromagnetic fields, false-positive ICD shocks, and the esthetic effect of ICD implantation. In addition, feelings of fear and anxiety were prevalent in participants' recollections of accepting an ICD. Conclusion: Further improvement in patient education before ICD placement is needed. The decision-making process can be simplified and patient regret and frustration minimized by providing reliable information that is accessible and interactive.
植入心律转复除颤器患者的决策经验和决策后悔
背景:强烈建议在植入心律转复除颤器(ICD)之前对患者进行教育,以防止或减轻ICD接受者的后悔和沮丧情绪。针对ICD的医疗保险指南需要一种共同的决策方法,在植入前关注患者的健康目标、价值观和偏好。然而,许多患者在植入ICD后康复或长期使用ICD时,并没有完全了解预期情况。目的:我们的目的是通过深入访谈了解需要ICD的患者的决策过程和决策后悔。方法:斯坦福大学医学中心的19名患者被招募参加个人访谈,使用封闭式和开放式问题进行对话。对访谈中的笔记进行了评估,并用于确定主要主题。结果:参与者描述了缺乏关于ICD术后恢复和植入后长期考虑的充分教育,如避免电磁场、假阳性ICD电击和ICD植入的美学效果。此外,在参与者接受ICD的回忆中,恐惧和焦虑情绪普遍存在。结论:植入式心脏复律除颤器植入前的患者教育需要进一步改进。通过提供可访问和交互式的可靠信息,可以简化决策过程,最大限度地减少患者的后悔和沮丧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信