{"title":"The The Development of Vocabulary and Overall Proficiency in English as an Additional (Third) Language. What Matters More, Daily Use or Age of Onset?","authors":"L. Cilibrasi, D. Marková","doi":"10.31261/tapsla.11862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While seminal work identified age of onset to L2 as a core predictor of L2 learning in naturalistic environments, recent research has shown that other variables, such as language use, are more important than an early age of onset in predicting L2 attainment in speakers who learn the second language primarily in school. In this study, we investigated whether the acquisition of vocabulary and the development of overall proficiency in English as L2 can be predicted more faithfully by daily language, intended as daily share of L2 use in comparison to L1s, or L2 age of onset. To explore this issue, we analyzed a large public dataset of 650 speakers (de Bruin et al., 2017), in which participants were native in Spanish and/or Basque and spoke English as an additional language. Participants were previously assessed on their vocabulary skills using the LexTALE task and on their overall proficiency using a semi-structured interview. Language skills were then added to a linear regression model where age of onset and daily use of English were treated as predictors. Our results show that, in this dataset, use is a better predictor of language skills (both lexical knowledge and overall proficiency) than age of onset.","PeriodicalId":37040,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/tapsla.11862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While seminal work identified age of onset to L2 as a core predictor of L2 learning in naturalistic environments, recent research has shown that other variables, such as language use, are more important than an early age of onset in predicting L2 attainment in speakers who learn the second language primarily in school. In this study, we investigated whether the acquisition of vocabulary and the development of overall proficiency in English as L2 can be predicted more faithfully by daily language, intended as daily share of L2 use in comparison to L1s, or L2 age of onset. To explore this issue, we analyzed a large public dataset of 650 speakers (de Bruin et al., 2017), in which participants were native in Spanish and/or Basque and spoke English as an additional language. Participants were previously assessed on their vocabulary skills using the LexTALE task and on their overall proficiency using a semi-structured interview. Language skills were then added to a linear regression model where age of onset and daily use of English were treated as predictors. Our results show that, in this dataset, use is a better predictor of language skills (both lexical knowledge and overall proficiency) than age of onset.
虽然开创性的工作将二语开始年龄确定为自然环境中二语学习的核心预测因素,但最近的研究表明,在预测主要在学校学习第二语言的说话者的二语成绩方面,其他变量,如语言使用,比早期开始年龄更重要。在这项研究中,我们调查了日常语言是否可以更准确地预测第二语言的词汇习得和整体英语水平的发展,即与第一语言或第二语言发病年龄相比,第二语言使用的日常份额。为了探讨这个问题,我们分析了一个由650名演讲者组成的大型公共数据集(de Bruin et al.,2017),其中参与者以西班牙语和/或巴斯克语为母语,并将英语作为一种附加语言。参与者之前使用LexTALE任务评估他们的词汇技能,并使用半结构化访谈评估他们的整体熟练程度。然后将语言技能添加到线性回归模型中,将发病年龄和日常英语使用作为预测因素。我们的研究结果表明,在这个数据集中,使用比发病年龄更能预测语言技能(词汇知识和整体熟练程度)。