Energy transition and pollution emissions in developing countries: are renewable energies guilty?

Q2 Social Sciences
E. Achuo, Nathanael Ojong
{"title":"Energy transition and pollution emissions in developing countries: are renewable energies guilty?","authors":"E. Achuo, Nathanael Ojong","doi":"10.1108/ijdi-05-2023-0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the effects of energy transition on pollution emissions in Africa. In addition, it explores the indirect channels through which energy consumption impacts environmental quality.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study uses system Generalised Method of Moments approach for a panel of 51 developing African countries over the 1996–2020 period.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that fossil fuel and renewable energy consumption increase pollution emissions. The environment-degrading effect of renewable energy in Africa is however counter-intuitive, though the results are robust across regional economic blocks and income groups except for upper-middle-income countries where energy consumption is environment enhancing. Moreover, the results show that the environmental impacts of non-renewable energy consumption are modulated through financial development and information and communication technology (ICT) adoption, leading to respective positive net effects of 0.04460796 and 0.07682873. This is up to respective policy thresholds of 203.265 and 137.105 of financial development and ICT adoption, respectively, when the positive net effects are nullified.\n\n\nPractical implications\nContingent on the results, the study suggests the need for African countries to develop sound financial systems and encourage the use of green technologies, to ensure that energy transition effectively contributes to emissions reduction. Policymakers in Africa should also be aware of the critical levels of financial development and ICT, beyond which complementary policies are required for non-renewable energy consumption to maintain a negative impact on environmental degradation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFirstly, extant studies on the nexus between energy transition and environmental degradation in Africa are very sparse. Therefore, this study fills the existing research gap by comprehensively examining the effects of energy transition on pollution emissions across 51 African economies. Additionally, besides accounting for the direct environmental effects of energy transition, the current study accounts for the indirect channels through which the environmental impacts of energy transition are modulated. Hence, this study provides critical thresholds for the policy modulating variables, which enlighten policymakers on the necessity of designing complementary policies once the modulating variables attain the established thresholds.\n","PeriodicalId":37830,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Development Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Development Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdi-05-2023-0114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the effects of energy transition on pollution emissions in Africa. In addition, it explores the indirect channels through which energy consumption impacts environmental quality. Design/methodology/approach The study uses system Generalised Method of Moments approach for a panel of 51 developing African countries over the 1996–2020 period. Findings The results show that fossil fuel and renewable energy consumption increase pollution emissions. The environment-degrading effect of renewable energy in Africa is however counter-intuitive, though the results are robust across regional economic blocks and income groups except for upper-middle-income countries where energy consumption is environment enhancing. Moreover, the results show that the environmental impacts of non-renewable energy consumption are modulated through financial development and information and communication technology (ICT) adoption, leading to respective positive net effects of 0.04460796 and 0.07682873. This is up to respective policy thresholds of 203.265 and 137.105 of financial development and ICT adoption, respectively, when the positive net effects are nullified. Practical implications Contingent on the results, the study suggests the need for African countries to develop sound financial systems and encourage the use of green technologies, to ensure that energy transition effectively contributes to emissions reduction. Policymakers in Africa should also be aware of the critical levels of financial development and ICT, beyond which complementary policies are required for non-renewable energy consumption to maintain a negative impact on environmental degradation. Originality/value Firstly, extant studies on the nexus between energy transition and environmental degradation in Africa are very sparse. Therefore, this study fills the existing research gap by comprehensively examining the effects of energy transition on pollution emissions across 51 African economies. Additionally, besides accounting for the direct environmental effects of energy transition, the current study accounts for the indirect channels through which the environmental impacts of energy transition are modulated. Hence, this study provides critical thresholds for the policy modulating variables, which enlighten policymakers on the necessity of designing complementary policies once the modulating variables attain the established thresholds.
发展中国家的能源转型和污染排放:可再生能源有罪吗?
目的本研究旨在检验能源转型对非洲污染排放的影响。此外,它还探讨了能源消耗影响环境质量的间接渠道。设计/方法论/方法该研究对1996-2020年期间由51个非洲发展中国家组成的小组使用了系统广义矩方法。研究结果表明,化石燃料和可再生能源的消耗增加了污染排放。然而,可再生能源在非洲对环境的破坏作用与直觉相悖,尽管除能源消耗正在改善环境的中上收入国家外,各区域经济体和收入群体的结果都很强劲。此外,研究结果表明,不可再生能源消费对环境的影响是通过金融发展和信息通信技术的采用来调节的,分别产生0.04460796和0.07682873的正净影响。当积极的净效应被抵消时,这分别达到了金融发展和信息和通信技术采用的203.265和137.105的政策阈值。实际意义根据研究结果,该研究表明,非洲国家需要发展健全的金融体系,鼓励使用绿色技术,以确保能源转型有效地促进减排。非洲的决策者还应该意识到金融发展和信息和通信技术的关键水平,超过这一水平,就需要对不可再生能源消费采取补充政策,以保持对环境退化的负面影响。原创性/价值首先,关于非洲能源转型与环境退化之间关系的现有研究非常稀少。因此,本研究通过全面考察能源转型对51个非洲经济体污染排放的影响,填补了现有的研究空白。此外,除了考虑能源转型的直接环境影响外,本研究还考虑了能源转型对环境影响的间接调节渠道。因此,本研究为政策调节变量提供了临界阈值,这启发了决策者在调节变量达到既定阈值后设计补充政策的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Development Issues
International Journal of Development Issues Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Development Issues (IJDI) publishes scholarly research on important development issues, with a particular focus on development dynamism and a leaning towards inter-disciplinary research. IJDI welcomes papers that are empirically oriented but such work should have solid methodological foundations based on realism and pragmatism rather than on idealism. Critical analysis of development issues from both the heteredox viewpoint and the neo-liberalist viewpoint, in orthodox tradition, are equally encouraged. The journal publishes authoritative, intelligent articles and research of direct relevance to those investigating and/or working within areas closely associated with development processes. Special consideration is given to research papers that consider development issues from either a socio-economic, political, historical or sociological, anthropological, ecological and technological standpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信