Feasibility of hypofractionated pelvic radiotherapy with parametrial and nodal simultaneous integrated boost for locally advanced cervical cancers: dummy run for the HYACINCT trial

W. Bacorro, Stellar Marie Cabrera, M. Bojador, M. Dumago, K. Baldivia, T. S. Sy Ortin
{"title":"Feasibility of hypofractionated pelvic radiotherapy with parametrial and nodal simultaneous integrated boost for locally advanced cervical cancers: dummy run for the HYACINCT trial","authors":"W. Bacorro, Stellar Marie Cabrera, M. Bojador, M. Dumago, K. Baldivia, T. S. Sy Ortin","doi":"10.25259/asjo_2_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe HYACINCT trial will investigate the role of dose-adapted hypofractionated pelvic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who are ineligible for cisplatin. This dummy run evaluated the feasibility of the protocol treatment planning objectives using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT).\n\n\n\nThe HYACINCT protocol defines a set of guidelines for image acquisition, target and organ delineation, and treatment planning objectives. Fifteen dummy cases were prepared, five each for three levels of dose requirements: 40 Gy without boost, and with boost to 45 Gy and to 48 Gy. IMRT and VMAT plans were prepared for each case, evaluated and assigned penalty and compliance scores according to planning objectives, and subjected to quality control. IMRT and VMAT plans were compared in terms of treatment plan quality (target coverage, penalty, and compliance scores), and treatment delivery. Tumor extent (T-stage, T-score), nodal status, and PTV volumes (in cc) were examined as potential determinants of penalty and compliance scores.\n\n\n\nIMRT was able to meet the planning objectives for all but one case; and VMAT, for all cases. All plans passed the quality control check. IMRT and VMAT were equivalent in terms of target coverage and penalty and compliance scores, but the latter was associated with better treatment delivery. T-score was a determinant for the penalty score.\n\n\n\nThe HYACINCT radiotherapy protocol is feasible with either IMRT or VMAT. VMAT may be beneficial in more extensive cases, as measured by the T-score.\n\n\n\nNCT05210270\n","PeriodicalId":31357,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/asjo_2_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The HYACINCT trial will investigate the role of dose-adapted hypofractionated pelvic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who are ineligible for cisplatin. This dummy run evaluated the feasibility of the protocol treatment planning objectives using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). The HYACINCT protocol defines a set of guidelines for image acquisition, target and organ delineation, and treatment planning objectives. Fifteen dummy cases were prepared, five each for three levels of dose requirements: 40 Gy without boost, and with boost to 45 Gy and to 48 Gy. IMRT and VMAT plans were prepared for each case, evaluated and assigned penalty and compliance scores according to planning objectives, and subjected to quality control. IMRT and VMAT plans were compared in terms of treatment plan quality (target coverage, penalty, and compliance scores), and treatment delivery. Tumor extent (T-stage, T-score), nodal status, and PTV volumes (in cc) were examined as potential determinants of penalty and compliance scores. IMRT was able to meet the planning objectives for all but one case; and VMAT, for all cases. All plans passed the quality control check. IMRT and VMAT were equivalent in terms of target coverage and penalty and compliance scores, but the latter was associated with better treatment delivery. T-score was a determinant for the penalty score. The HYACINCT radiotherapy protocol is feasible with either IMRT or VMAT. VMAT may be beneficial in more extensive cases, as measured by the T-score. NCT05210270
子宫旁和淋巴结同时综合增强低分割盆腔放疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的可行性:HYACINCT试验的模拟运行
HYACINCT试验将研究剂量适应性低分割盆腔放疗在局部晚期癌症患者中的作用,这些患者不符合顺铂治疗条件。该模拟运行评估了使用强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)和体积电弧治疗(VMAT)的方案治疗计划目标的可行性。HYACINCT方案定义了一套图像采集、目标和器官描绘以及治疗计划目标指南。准备了15个模拟病例,其中5个用于三个剂量要求水平:40 Gy无加强剂量,45 Gy和48 Gy加强剂量。为每个病例准备IMRT和VMAT计划,根据计划目标评估和分配惩罚和依从性得分,并进行质量控制。IMRT和VMAT计划在治疗计划质量(目标覆盖率、惩罚和依从性得分)和治疗交付方面进行了比较。肿瘤范围(T分期、T评分)、淋巴结状态和PTV体积(cc)被检查为惩罚和依从性评分的潜在决定因素。IMRT能够实现除一个案例以外的所有案例的规划目标;以及VMAT。所有计划都通过了质量控制检查。IMRT和VMAT在目标覆盖率、惩罚和依从性得分方面相当,但后者与更好的治疗效果有关。T分数是决定点球得分的因素。HYACINCT放射治疗方案适用于IMRT或VMAT。VMAT在更广泛的情况下可能是有益的,正如T型芯所测量的那样。NCT05210270
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书