Perioperative risk factors for delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of the complications

X. Deng, Ting Niu, Zhaolong Han, Xing Liang, Z. Fu, Liang Tang, Guang Yang, Judong Li, A. Liu, J. Peng, Minghui Zheng, C. Shao
{"title":"Perioperative risk factors for delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of the complications","authors":"X. Deng, Ting Niu, Zhaolong Han, Xing Liang, Z. Fu, Liang Tang, Guang Yang, Judong Li, A. Liu, J. Peng, Minghui Zheng, C. Shao","doi":"10.1097/JP9.0000000000000117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the correlation between the incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and the perioperative possible risk factors. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Medline for studies describing complications related to PD from 2018 to 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/SE16.0 software. Results: In 6 retrospective studies, 1 systematic review, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) experiment, 12,419 patients (2174 and 10,245 patients, respectively, in DGE and no delayed gastric emptying [NDGE] groups). The preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score between DGE and NDGE groups (log odds ratio [OR] = 0.23, 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.11–0.35, P < .01), operation time (mean diff. = 21.87, 95% CI: 15.96–27.78, P < .01), estimated intraoperative blood loss (EIBL; mean diff. = 70.67, 95% CI: 17.75–123.58, P < .05), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (log OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.24–1.46, P < .05) were statistically significant. No significant differences in preoperative body mass index (BMI), preoperative biliary drainage, and pancreatic texture were observed (P > .05). Conclusion: The incidence of DGE is significantly correlated with the operation time, preoperative ASA score, POPF, and EIBL,which suggests that the surgeon should thoroughly evaluate the patient through adequate preoperative examination before the operation. Finally, standardized practice and perfect technology are undoubtedly necessary to reduce complications.","PeriodicalId":92925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pancreatology","volume":"6 1","pages":"67 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JP9.0000000000000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the correlation between the incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and the perioperative possible risk factors. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Medline for studies describing complications related to PD from 2018 to 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/SE16.0 software. Results: In 6 retrospective studies, 1 systematic review, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) experiment, 12,419 patients (2174 and 10,245 patients, respectively, in DGE and no delayed gastric emptying [NDGE] groups). The preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score between DGE and NDGE groups (log odds ratio [OR] = 0.23, 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.11–0.35, P < .01), operation time (mean diff. = 21.87, 95% CI: 15.96–27.78, P < .01), estimated intraoperative blood loss (EIBL; mean diff. = 70.67, 95% CI: 17.75–123.58, P < .05), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (log OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.24–1.46, P < .05) were statistically significant. No significant differences in preoperative body mass index (BMI), preoperative biliary drainage, and pancreatic texture were observed (P > .05). Conclusion: The incidence of DGE is significantly correlated with the operation time, preoperative ASA score, POPF, and EIBL,which suggests that the surgeon should thoroughly evaluate the patient through adequate preoperative examination before the operation. Finally, standardized practice and perfect technology are undoubtedly necessary to reduce complications.
胰十二指肠切除术后胃排空延迟的围手术期危险因素:并发症的荟萃分析
目的:评价胰十二指肠切除术(PD)胃排空延迟(DGE)的发生率与围手术期可能的危险因素之间的相关性。方法:我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Medline上搜索了2018年至2022年描述PD相关并发症的研究。使用Stata/SE16.0软件进行统计分析。结果:在6项回顾性研究、1项系统综述和1项随机对照试验(RCT)实验中,12419名患者(DGE组和无延迟胃排空[NDGE]组分别为2174名和10245名患者)。DGE组和NDGE组的术前美国麻醉师协会(ASA)评分(对数比值比[OR]=0.23,95%可信区间[CI]:0.11–0.35,P<.01)、手术时间(平均差值=21.87,95%CI:15.96–27.78,P<.001)、估计术中失血量(EIBL;平均差值=70.67,95%CI=17.75–123.58,P<.05),术后胰瘘(POPF)(log OR=0.85,95%CI:0.24-1.46,P<.05)具有统计学意义。术前体重指数(BMI)、术前胆道引流和胰腺质地无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:DGE的发生率与手术时间、术前ASA评分、POPF和EIBL显著相关,这表明外科医生应该在手术前通过充分的术前检查来彻底评估患者。最后,规范的实践和完善的技术对于减少并发症无疑是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信