Anisotropy and Asymmetry of the Elastic Tensor of Lattice Materials

IF 1.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Huiming Yin, Chao Liu
{"title":"Anisotropy and Asymmetry of the Elastic Tensor of Lattice Materials","authors":"Huiming Yin,&nbsp;Chao Liu","doi":"10.1007/s10659-023-10028-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lattice materials formed by hinged springs or linear elastic bonds may exhibit diverse anisotropy and asymmetry features of the overall elastic behavior depending on their unit cell configuration. The recently developed singum model transfers the force-displacement relationship of the springs in the lattice to the stress-strain relationship in the continuum particle, and provides the analytical form of tangential elasticity. When a pre-stress exists in the lattice, the stiffness tensor significantly changes due to the effect of the configurational stress; existing methods like the lattice spring method, relying on a scalar energy equivalence, are insufficient in such situations. Instead, a tensorial homogenization method with the new definition of singum stress and strain, should be preferred. Different lattice structures lead to different symmetries of the stiffness tensors, which are demonstrated by five lattices. When all bonds exhibit the same length, regular hexagonal, honeycomb, and auxetic lattices demonstrate that the stiffness changes from an isotropic to anisotropic, from symmetric to asymmetric tensor. When the central symmetry of the unit cell is not satisfied, the primitive cell will contain more than one singums and the Cauchy–Born rule fails by the loss of equilibrium of the single singum. A secondary stress is induced to balance the singums. Displacement gradient <span>\\(d_{ij}=u_{j,i}\\)</span> is proposed to replace strain in the constitutive law for the general case because <span>\\(d_{12}\\)</span> and <span>\\(d_{21}\\)</span> can produce different stress states. Although the hexagonal and honeycomb lattices may exhibit isotropic behavior, for general auxetic lattices, an anisotropic and asymmetric elastic tensor is obtained with the loss of both minor and major symmetry, which is also demonstrated in a square lattice with unbalanced central symmetry and a chiral lattice. The modeling procedure and results can be generalized to three dimensions and other lattices with the anisotropic and asymmetric stiffness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elasticity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elasticity","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10659-023-10028-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lattice materials formed by hinged springs or linear elastic bonds may exhibit diverse anisotropy and asymmetry features of the overall elastic behavior depending on their unit cell configuration. The recently developed singum model transfers the force-displacement relationship of the springs in the lattice to the stress-strain relationship in the continuum particle, and provides the analytical form of tangential elasticity. When a pre-stress exists in the lattice, the stiffness tensor significantly changes due to the effect of the configurational stress; existing methods like the lattice spring method, relying on a scalar energy equivalence, are insufficient in such situations. Instead, a tensorial homogenization method with the new definition of singum stress and strain, should be preferred. Different lattice structures lead to different symmetries of the stiffness tensors, which are demonstrated by five lattices. When all bonds exhibit the same length, regular hexagonal, honeycomb, and auxetic lattices demonstrate that the stiffness changes from an isotropic to anisotropic, from symmetric to asymmetric tensor. When the central symmetry of the unit cell is not satisfied, the primitive cell will contain more than one singums and the Cauchy–Born rule fails by the loss of equilibrium of the single singum. A secondary stress is induced to balance the singums. Displacement gradient \(d_{ij}=u_{j,i}\) is proposed to replace strain in the constitutive law for the general case because \(d_{12}\) and \(d_{21}\) can produce different stress states. Although the hexagonal and honeycomb lattices may exhibit isotropic behavior, for general auxetic lattices, an anisotropic and asymmetric elastic tensor is obtained with the loss of both minor and major symmetry, which is also demonstrated in a square lattice with unbalanced central symmetry and a chiral lattice. The modeling procedure and results can be generalized to three dimensions and other lattices with the anisotropic and asymmetric stiffness.

Abstract Image

晶格材料弹性张量的各向异性和非对称性
由铰链弹簧或线性弹性键形成的晶格材料,根据其单元格构造的不同,整体弹性行为可能表现出不同的各向异性和不对称性特征。最近开发的单子模型将晶格中弹簧的力-位移关系转移到连续粒子的应力-应变关系中,并提供了切向弹性的分析形式。当晶格中存在预应力时,由于构型应力的影响,刚度张量会发生显著变化;在这种情况下,依赖标量能量等价的现有方法(如晶格弹簧法)是不够的。取而代之的是采用新定义的单一应力和应变的张量均匀化方法。不同的晶格结构会导致刚度张量具有不同的对称性,这可以通过五个晶格来证明。当所有键的长度相同时,正六方晶格、蜂巢晶格和辅助晶格表明刚度从各向同性变为各向异性,从对称张量变为不对称张量。当单元格的中心对称性不满足时,原始单元格将包含一个以上的奇异体,由于单个奇异体失去平衡,考奇-伯恩法则失效。这时会产生一个次应力来平衡各单体。由于 \(d_{12}\) 和 \(d_{21}\) 可以产生不同的应力状态,因此建议用位移梯度 \(d_{ij}=u_{j,i}\) 来代替一般情况下构成定律中的应变。虽然六角形和蜂窝状晶格可能表现出各向同性,但对于一般的辅助晶格,在失去小对称和大对称的情况下,会得到各向异性和不对称的弹性张量,这在具有不平衡中心对称的正方形晶格和手性晶格中也得到了证明。建模过程和结果可推广到三维空间和其他具有各向异性和不对称刚度的晶格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Elasticity
Journal of Elasticity 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Elasticity was founded in 1971 by Marvin Stippes (1922-1979), with its main purpose being to report original and significant discoveries in elasticity. The Journal has broadened in scope over the years to include original contributions in the physical and mathematical science of solids. The areas of rational mechanics, mechanics of materials, including theories of soft materials, biomechanics, and engineering sciences that contribute to fundamental advancements in understanding and predicting the complex behavior of solids are particularly welcomed. The role of elasticity in all such behavior is well recognized and reporting significant discoveries in elasticity remains important to the Journal, as is its relation to thermal and mass transport, electromagnetism, and chemical reactions. Fundamental research that applies the concepts of physics and elements of applied mathematical science is of particular interest. Original research contributions will appear as either full research papers or research notes. Well-documented historical essays and reviews also are welcomed. Materials that will prove effective in teaching will appear as classroom notes. Computational and/or experimental investigations that emphasize relationships to the modeling of the novel physical behavior of solids at all scales are of interest. Guidance principles for content are to be found in the current interests of the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信