Pilihan rasional alumni ilmu perpustakaan pada pekerjaan non-pustakawan

Rizki Nurislaminingsih, Sukaesih Sukaesih, Y. Winoto, Atiqa Nur Latifa Hanum
{"title":"Pilihan rasional alumni ilmu perpustakaan pada pekerjaan non-pustakawan","authors":"Rizki Nurislaminingsih, Sukaesih Sukaesih, Y. Winoto, Atiqa Nur Latifa Hanum","doi":"10.22146/bip.v18i1.2323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The establishment of Library Science Schools is expected to prepare professionals in library fields. In fact, there are many graduates who choose non-librarian jobs, therefore, it is necessary to examine their rational choices of the jobs. \nResearch methods. This study uses a qualitative narrative to explore the rational choices of seven informants. \nData analysis. Data were analysed by summarizing the results of interviews and sorting them based on the topics and presented in a narrative way. Interviews were conducted from April 2019 to March 2020. \nResults and Discussion. The non-librarian jobs selected were lecturers, heads of academic division, book editors, finance staff, entrepreneurs, and the drafting and reporting staff. The decisions were made by  considering opportunities to learn new things, public recognition, income, and job comfort. This study found that some of the knowledge gained from library sciences (management, communication, marketing, classification, and cataloging) can be applied to non-librarian jobs. \nConclusion and suggestions. The choice of non-librarian jobs are selected based on considerations for further learning, social appreciation, salary, and environment. The consequence is to learn new knowledge and skills. The results of this study may be a reference for future research on job selection by using rational  theory and motivation theory.","PeriodicalId":31595,"journal":{"name":"Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v18i1.2323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The establishment of Library Science Schools is expected to prepare professionals in library fields. In fact, there are many graduates who choose non-librarian jobs, therefore, it is necessary to examine their rational choices of the jobs. Research methods. This study uses a qualitative narrative to explore the rational choices of seven informants. Data analysis. Data were analysed by summarizing the results of interviews and sorting them based on the topics and presented in a narrative way. Interviews were conducted from April 2019 to March 2020. Results and Discussion. The non-librarian jobs selected were lecturers, heads of academic division, book editors, finance staff, entrepreneurs, and the drafting and reporting staff. The decisions were made by  considering opportunities to learn new things, public recognition, income, and job comfort. This study found that some of the knowledge gained from library sciences (management, communication, marketing, classification, and cataloging) can be applied to non-librarian jobs. Conclusion and suggestions. The choice of non-librarian jobs are selected based on considerations for further learning, social appreciation, salary, and environment. The consequence is to learn new knowledge and skills. The results of this study may be a reference for future research on job selection by using rational  theory and motivation theory.
图书馆科学家非馆员工作的理性选择
介绍图书馆科学学校的建立有望培养图书馆领域的专业人才。事实上,有许多毕业生选择了非图书管理员的工作,所以,有必要审视他们对工作的理性选择。研究方法。本研究采用质的叙述方式,探讨七位知情者的理性选择。数据分析。通过总结访谈结果并根据主题对其进行排序来分析数据,并以叙述的方式呈现。访谈于2019年4月至2020年3月进行。结果和讨论。选定的非图书管理员职位包括讲师、学术部门负责人、图书编辑、财务人员、企业家以及起草和报告人员。这些决定是通过考虑学习新事物的机会、公众认可度、收入和工作舒适度而做出的。这项研究发现,从图书馆学(管理、传播、营销、分类和编目)中获得的一些知识可以应用于非图书馆员的工作。结论和建议。非图书管理员职位的选择是基于对进一步学习、社会评价、工资和环境的考虑。其结果是学习新的知识和技能。本研究的结果可为未来运用理性理论和动机理论进行择业研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信