Public Perception of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Among Psoriasis Patients in Social Media: Content, Sentiment, and Engagement Analysis.

Q3 Medicine
Danielle Yee, Sabrina Khan, Caterina Zagona-Prizio, Nicole Maynard, Rasika Reddy, Samiya Khan, Manan Mehta, April W Armstrong
{"title":"Public Perception of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Among Psoriasis Patients in Social Media: Content, Sentiment, and Engagement Analysis.","authors":"Danielle Yee, Sabrina Khan, Caterina Zagona-Prizio, Nicole Maynard, Rasika Reddy, Samiya Khan, Manan Mehta, April W Armstrong","doi":"10.1177/24755303221110095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psoriasis patients may seek information about the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and their disease from social media platforms. Analyses of social media interactions may help guide dermatologists' educational efforts during this pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study analyzes social media interactions among patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis regarding the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to determine the misinformation circulating and the apprehension to receiving the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Publicly accessible Facebook and Reddit groups regarding psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were identified. Posts uploaded between March 1, 2021 and July 31, 2021 which contained information about the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were extracted. First-order themes, sub-themes, sentiment scores and engagement scores were assigned to each post.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>345 posts within the first-order theme of <i>vaccination decision</i> and 1379 posts within the first-order theme of <i>vaccine reaction</i> were analyzed. Within <i>vaccination decision</i>, common sub-themes for refusing the vaccine include <i>fear of psoriasis flare up, vaccine is experimental, vaccine is unnecessary, vaccine is dangerous</i>, and <i>concern for reaction/vaccine efficacy while on psoriasis medications</i>. 41.4% of posts contained positive sentiment; whereas, 38.3% contained negative sentiment. Within <i>vaccine reaction</i>, common sub-themes identified were <i>no change to psoriasis, skin/joint flare up, skin flare up attributed specifically to stopping psoriasis medications, skin/joint improvement,</i> and <i>skin flare up but vaccine was worth it</i>. 77.8% of posts contained positive sentiment; whereas, 6.2% contained negative sentiment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study identified common SARS-CoV-2 vaccine concerns within the psoriasis community which should be used to guide educational efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":36656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis","volume":"7 1","pages":"164-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9207593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24755303221110095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psoriasis patients may seek information about the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and their disease from social media platforms. Analyses of social media interactions may help guide dermatologists' educational efforts during this pandemic.

Objectives: This study analyzes social media interactions among patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis regarding the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to determine the misinformation circulating and the apprehension to receiving the vaccine.

Methods: Publicly accessible Facebook and Reddit groups regarding psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were identified. Posts uploaded between March 1, 2021 and July 31, 2021 which contained information about the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were extracted. First-order themes, sub-themes, sentiment scores and engagement scores were assigned to each post.

Results: 345 posts within the first-order theme of vaccination decision and 1379 posts within the first-order theme of vaccine reaction were analyzed. Within vaccination decision, common sub-themes for refusing the vaccine include fear of psoriasis flare up, vaccine is experimental, vaccine is unnecessary, vaccine is dangerous, and concern for reaction/vaccine efficacy while on psoriasis medications. 41.4% of posts contained positive sentiment; whereas, 38.3% contained negative sentiment. Within vaccine reaction, common sub-themes identified were no change to psoriasis, skin/joint flare up, skin flare up attributed specifically to stopping psoriasis medications, skin/joint improvement, and skin flare up but vaccine was worth it. 77.8% of posts contained positive sentiment; whereas, 6.2% contained negative sentiment.

Conclusions: Our study identified common SARS-CoV-2 vaccine concerns within the psoriasis community which should be used to guide educational efforts.

社交媒体中银屑病患者对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫苗的公众认知:内容、情绪和参与度分析
背景银屑病患者可能会从社交媒体平台上寻求有关严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫苗及其疾病的信息。对社交媒体互动的分析可能有助于指导皮肤科医生在疫情期间的教育工作。目的本研究分析了银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者之间关于严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫苗的社交媒体互动,以确定传播的错误信息和对接种疫苗的担忧。方法确定可公开访问的关于银屑病和银屑病关节炎的Facebook和Reddit群组。提取了2021年3月1日至2021年7月31日期间上传的包含严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫苗信息的帖子。一阶主题、子主题、情感得分和参与度得分被分配给每个帖子。结果分析了345个疫苗接种决策一级主题内的帖子和1379个疫苗反应一级主题外的帖子。在疫苗接种决定中,拒绝接种疫苗的常见子主题包括对银屑病发作的恐惧、疫苗是实验性的、疫苗是不必要的、疫苗有危险的,以及在服用银屑病药物时对反应/疫苗效力的担忧。41.4%的帖子包含积极情绪;38.3%的人有负面情绪。在疫苗反应中,确定的常见子主题是银屑病没有变化、皮肤/关节炎症、专门归因于停止银屑病药物的皮肤炎症、皮肤/联合改善和皮肤炎症,但疫苗是值得的。77.8%的帖子包含积极情绪;6.2%的人有负面情绪。结论我们的研究确定了银屑病社区中常见的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫苗问题,应用于指导教育工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信