{"title":"Economic Pessimism and the 2022 Election: A Postmortem","authors":"Brad Lockerbie","doi":"10.1086/725243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prospective model of voting behavior has its genesis in the forecasting errors made in 1994. Virtually every political scientist that made a forecast was off by a good bit. One political scientist made a bet concerning the accuracy of his forecast of the Republicans only picking up in the low single digits. The actual outcome was a fifty-four-seat pickup by the Republicans. The political scientist (who shall remain nameless here) who made the single-digit forecast lost a modest sum of money. Like many articles, this project started by thinking that the others in the enterprise had made some mistakes. Many of the models make use of economic conditions when attempting to forecast election outcomes. The voting behavior literature is replete with retrospective and prospective economic models of voting behavior. Unfortunately, political forecasting with economic data necessitates parsimony because we have few cases. Consequently, the model employed here follows the literature focusing on economic expectations. Specifically, the Survey of Consumer Attitudes and Behavior has an item that asks respondents to evaluate whether they will be better off or worse off in the","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The prospective model of voting behavior has its genesis in the forecasting errors made in 1994. Virtually every political scientist that made a forecast was off by a good bit. One political scientist made a bet concerning the accuracy of his forecast of the Republicans only picking up in the low single digits. The actual outcome was a fifty-four-seat pickup by the Republicans. The political scientist (who shall remain nameless here) who made the single-digit forecast lost a modest sum of money. Like many articles, this project started by thinking that the others in the enterprise had made some mistakes. Many of the models make use of economic conditions when attempting to forecast election outcomes. The voting behavior literature is replete with retrospective and prospective economic models of voting behavior. Unfortunately, political forecasting with economic data necessitates parsimony because we have few cases. Consequently, the model employed here follows the literature focusing on economic expectations. Specifically, the Survey of Consumer Attitudes and Behavior has an item that asks respondents to evaluate whether they will be better off or worse off in the
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.