Utility of Hematological Parameters in Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis in Comparison to C-Reactive Protein

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
D. Joshi, S. Padma, J. K., Shreya Goel, Abena Hidangmayum
{"title":"Utility of Hematological Parameters in Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis in Comparison to C-Reactive Protein","authors":"D. Joshi, S. Padma, J. K., Shreya Goel, Abena Hidangmayum","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  Neonatal sepsis is the most common cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. As neonatal sepsis presents with subtle symptoms and signs, decision to start empirical antibiotics is most often based on risk profile. Hematological parameters and C-reactive protein (CRP) are routinely done as a part of sepsis screening, but isolation of microorganism on blood culture is the gold standard for diagnosis of sepsis. Methodology  One-hundred neonates with suspected sepsis were studied and their hematological parameters, hematological scoring system (HSS), and CRP were correlated to blood culture. Results  Among the study population, immature to total neutrophil count (I:T) ratio had the best sensitivity (94.1%) and negative predictive value (83.3%), followed by HSS with a sensitivity of 64.7% and negative predictive value of 68.4%, whereas CRP was more specific (75.9%). Conclusion  HSS and CRP are good predictors of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. I:T ratio had the best sensitivity and negative predictive value.","PeriodicalId":40092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background  Neonatal sepsis is the most common cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. As neonatal sepsis presents with subtle symptoms and signs, decision to start empirical antibiotics is most often based on risk profile. Hematological parameters and C-reactive protein (CRP) are routinely done as a part of sepsis screening, but isolation of microorganism on blood culture is the gold standard for diagnosis of sepsis. Methodology  One-hundred neonates with suspected sepsis were studied and their hematological parameters, hematological scoring system (HSS), and CRP were correlated to blood culture. Results  Among the study population, immature to total neutrophil count (I:T) ratio had the best sensitivity (94.1%) and negative predictive value (83.3%), followed by HSS with a sensitivity of 64.7% and negative predictive value of 68.4%, whereas CRP was more specific (75.9%). Conclusion  HSS and CRP are good predictors of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. I:T ratio had the best sensitivity and negative predictive value.
血液学参数在新生儿败血症早期诊断中的作用与C反应蛋白的比较
摘要背景 新生儿败血症是导致新生儿死亡和发病的最常见原因。由于新生儿败血症表现出微妙的症状和体征,开始使用经验性抗生素的决定通常是基于风险状况。血液学参数和C反应蛋白(CRP)是败血症筛查的一部分,但在血液培养中分离微生物是诊断败血症的金标准。方法论 对100例疑似败血症新生儿进行了研究,并将其血液学参数、血液学评分系统(HSS)和CRP与血液培养相关。后果 在研究人群中,未成熟中性粒细胞与总中性粒细胞计数(I:T)的比率具有最佳的敏感性(94.1%)和阴性预测值(83.3%),其次是HSS,敏感性为64.7%,阴性预测值为68.4%,而CRP更具特异性(75.9%) HSS和CRP是诊断新生儿败血症的良好预测指标。I: T比值具有最佳的敏感性和阴性预测值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
85
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信