Poetic Objectivity

IF 0.1 4区 社会学
Andreas Weber
{"title":"Poetic Objectivity","authors":"Andreas Weber","doi":"10.14464/zsem.v37i3-4.368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I will explore the possibility of an objective ecological ethics. To do this, I follow the embodied ethos of relationships: meaningful expression and mutual sharing occuring in living organisms and systems. Living beings on various levels of identity (cellular selves, individuals, and ecosystems) strive toward increased aliveness. They are self-healing, and generate meaningful relationships, all without the need or interference of human ethical thinking. Ecosystems tend toward complexity and organisms tend to avoid their own destruction. Both tendencies create “natural values” – values not extractable into abstraction, yet nonetheless fundamentally embodied in the actions of living beings and living systems. An ethics based on these principles (or insights) is inclusive in that it can be conceived as a sort of “poetic objectivity”. Here the ethically good is the increase in “aliveness”, which can be shared by other beings, and which is only possible as “being through the other”. Aliveness is ineffable and cannot be extracted analytically. Hence it is objective only in a poetic sense that can be shared through participation. An ethics of poetic objectivity leaves room to negotiate individual relationships and narratives while providing goodness as an encompassing context tuning into the degree of sharing and mutual inspiration to be more alive. The natural values generated by sharing transformative relationships produce the whole of nature as an “ethical commons”. Its principles can be instructive in reorganising human exchange on ethical and economical levels.","PeriodicalId":53195,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SEMIOTIK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SEMIOTIK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14464/zsem.v37i3-4.368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay I will explore the possibility of an objective ecological ethics. To do this, I follow the embodied ethos of relationships: meaningful expression and mutual sharing occuring in living organisms and systems. Living beings on various levels of identity (cellular selves, individuals, and ecosystems) strive toward increased aliveness. They are self-healing, and generate meaningful relationships, all without the need or interference of human ethical thinking. Ecosystems tend toward complexity and organisms tend to avoid their own destruction. Both tendencies create “natural values” – values not extractable into abstraction, yet nonetheless fundamentally embodied in the actions of living beings and living systems. An ethics based on these principles (or insights) is inclusive in that it can be conceived as a sort of “poetic objectivity”. Here the ethically good is the increase in “aliveness”, which can be shared by other beings, and which is only possible as “being through the other”. Aliveness is ineffable and cannot be extracted analytically. Hence it is objective only in a poetic sense that can be shared through participation. An ethics of poetic objectivity leaves room to negotiate individual relationships and narratives while providing goodness as an encompassing context tuning into the degree of sharing and mutual inspiration to be more alive. The natural values generated by sharing transformative relationships produce the whole of nature as an “ethical commons”. Its principles can be instructive in reorganising human exchange on ethical and economical levels.
诗意客观性
在这篇文章中,我将探讨一种客观的生态伦理学的可能性。为了做到这一点,我遵循关系的具体精神:在生物体和系统中发生有意义的表达和相互分享。不同身份层次的生物(细胞自我、个体和生态系统)努力提高活力。它们是自我修复的,并产生有意义的关系,所有这些都不需要或干扰人类的伦理思想。生态系统趋向于复杂性,而生物体则倾向于避免自身的破坏。这两种趋势都创造了“自然价值观”——这些价值观不能抽象化,但从根本上体现在生命和生命系统的行动中。基于这些原则(或见解)的伦理学具有包容性,因为它可以被视为一种“诗意的客观性”。在这里,道德上的好处是“活力”的增加,这种活力可以被其他人分享,并且只有“通过他人存在”才有可能。活力是无法形容的,无法通过分析来提取。因此,它只有在诗意的意义上才是客观的,可以通过参与来分享。诗意客观性的伦理为谈判个人关系和叙事留出了空间,同时提供了善作为一个包容的背景,以适应分享和相互激励的程度,使其更具活力。共享变革关系所产生的自然价值观将整个自然作为“伦理公地”产生。它的原则可以指导在伦理和经济层面上重组人类交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SEMIOTIK
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SEMIOTIK HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The Journal of Semiotics (Zeitschrift für Semiotik) has been in print since 1979. It is the voice of the German Society of Semiotics and is issued in cooperation with the Swiss Society for Semiotics (Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Semiotik). The Zeitschrift für Semiotik offers the possibility of sharing research information via the publication and discussion of the results of semiotic investigations, regardless of the sub-discipline(s) of the researchers. Logo ERIH PLUS Submissions to the journal pass through a double-blind peer-review process by reviewers from external institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信