Knowledge and Attitude towards COVID-19: A Cross Sectional Study in Bangladesh through Phone and Online Survey

Anwarul Karim, T. Banu, Mastura Akter, A. Mazid, O. S. Pulock, T. T. Aziz, Samira Hayee, Nowrin Tamanna, GS Chuwdhury, A. Haque, Farhana Yeasmin, M. A. Mitu, F. Yeasmin, H. Rashid, Ashish Kumar Kuri, Arni Das, Koushik Majumder, Dipen Barua, M. Rahaman, S. Akter, Nashid Niaz Munia, Jabin Sultana, Faeeqa Usaila, Sabrina Sifat, N. Nourin, Md. Forhad Uddin, M. Bhowmik, T. Ahammed, N. Sharik, Quddus Mehnaz, Md. Nur Hossain Bhuiyan
{"title":"Knowledge and Attitude towards COVID-19: A Cross Sectional Study in Bangladesh through Phone and Online Survey","authors":"Anwarul Karim, T. Banu, Mastura Akter, A. Mazid, O. S. Pulock, T. T. Aziz, Samira Hayee, Nowrin Tamanna, GS Chuwdhury, A. Haque, Farhana Yeasmin, M. A. Mitu, F. Yeasmin, H. Rashid, Ashish Kumar Kuri, Arni Das, Koushik Majumder, Dipen Barua, M. Rahaman, S. Akter, Nashid Niaz Munia, Jabin Sultana, Faeeqa Usaila, Sabrina Sifat, N. Nourin, Md. Forhad Uddin, M. Bhowmik, T. Ahammed, N. Sharik, Quddus Mehnaz, Md. Nur Hossain Bhuiyan","doi":"10.29333/jcei/9143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study investigated the knowledge and attitudes towards COVID-19 in Bangladeshi adults by online and phone survey methods during the early stage of its spread.\nMethods: Data were collected through phone calls (April 14-23, 2020) and online survey (April 18-19, 2020) in Bangladesh. The questionnaire had 20 knowledge questions with each correct response getting one point and incorrect/don’t know response getting no point (maximum total knowledge score 20). Participants scoring >17 were categorized as having good knowledge.\nResults: The percentages of good knowledge holders were 57.6%, 75.1%, and 95.8% in the phone, online non-medical, and online medical participants, respectively. Most of the phone and online participants had good knowledge of the preventive practices of COVID-19. However, among the non-medical participants (both phone and online), the correct response rates were lower than 80% for the knowledge questions asking about the facts that - some patients may have no symptoms, diarrhea is a symptom of this disease and that it cannot be prevented by any currently available medication. Male gender, higher education, living in town/urban areas, good financial condition, and use of internet were positively associated with higher knowledge score among the non-medical participants. However, higher knowledge score was associated with having less confidence in the final control of COVID-19.\nConclusion: Our study identified some COVID-19 information that were less known among the participants and the potential factors that were associated with having good versus poor knowledge. Besides, this study sheds light on the attitude of Bangladeshi adults towards COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":53255,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/jcei/9143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aim: This study investigated the knowledge and attitudes towards COVID-19 in Bangladeshi adults by online and phone survey methods during the early stage of its spread. Methods: Data were collected through phone calls (April 14-23, 2020) and online survey (April 18-19, 2020) in Bangladesh. The questionnaire had 20 knowledge questions with each correct response getting one point and incorrect/don’t know response getting no point (maximum total knowledge score 20). Participants scoring >17 were categorized as having good knowledge. Results: The percentages of good knowledge holders were 57.6%, 75.1%, and 95.8% in the phone, online non-medical, and online medical participants, respectively. Most of the phone and online participants had good knowledge of the preventive practices of COVID-19. However, among the non-medical participants (both phone and online), the correct response rates were lower than 80% for the knowledge questions asking about the facts that - some patients may have no symptoms, diarrhea is a symptom of this disease and that it cannot be prevented by any currently available medication. Male gender, higher education, living in town/urban areas, good financial condition, and use of internet were positively associated with higher knowledge score among the non-medical participants. However, higher knowledge score was associated with having less confidence in the final control of COVID-19. Conclusion: Our study identified some COVID-19 information that were less known among the participants and the potential factors that were associated with having good versus poor knowledge. Besides, this study sheds light on the attitude of Bangladeshi adults towards COVID-19.
对新冠肺炎的知识和态度:通过电话和在线调查在孟加拉国进行的跨部门研究
目的:本研究采用在线和电话调查方法,调查了孟加拉国成年人在新冠肺炎传播早期对其的知识和态度。方法:通过电话(2020年4月14日至23日)和在线调查(2020年四月18日至19日)在孟加拉国收集数据。问卷共有20个知识问题,每个正确答案得1分,不正确/不知道答案得不到分(最高知识总分为20分)。得分>17的参与者被归类为具有良好的知识。结果:在电话、在线非医疗和在线医疗参与者中,良好知识持有者的比例分别为57.6%、75.1%和95.8%。大多数电话和在线参与者对新冠肺炎的预防措施有很好的了解。然而,在非医学参与者(包括电话和在线参与者)中,关于以下事实的知识问题的正确回答率低于80%:有些患者可能没有症状,腹泻是这种疾病的症状,目前任何可用的药物都无法预防。在非医学参与者中,男性、受过高等教育、居住在城镇、良好的经济状况和使用互联网与较高的知识得分呈正相关。然而,知识得分越高,对COVID-19的最终控制信心越低。结论:我们的研究确定了参与者中不太了解的一些COVID-19]信息,以及与知识好与差相关的潜在因素。此外,本研究揭示了孟加拉国成年人对新冠肺炎的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信