“Fact” versus “Fancy” among Victorian Professionals in Hard Times

IF 0.7 1区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
Masayo Hasegawa
{"title":"“Fact” versus “Fancy” among Victorian Professionals in Hard Times","authors":"Masayo Hasegawa","doi":"10.1353/dqt.2023.a904840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Mid-19th-century England saw the expansion and growth of professionalism. Read in this context, Hard Times (1854) can be construed as a critique of both Victorian professionals in general and literary professionals in particular, specifically novelists. Thomas Gradgrind emerges as a representative of contemporary fact-oriented professionals, and fiction writers turn out to be their antithesis. The novel defines fiction writers as both agents of morality and informants of essential facts necessary to the social reform of Victorian society, while disqualifying other factualist professionals from such roles. These views imply that Dickens believed his profession had special merits and advantages compared to others. However, they also reflect his anxieties about the unstable and increasingly feminized condition of novelists; in other words, the threat to his own professional and masculine identity. In Hard Times, Dickens was attempting to enhance the respectability of his profession and legitimize its masculinity.","PeriodicalId":41747,"journal":{"name":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dqt.2023.a904840","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Mid-19th-century England saw the expansion and growth of professionalism. Read in this context, Hard Times (1854) can be construed as a critique of both Victorian professionals in general and literary professionals in particular, specifically novelists. Thomas Gradgrind emerges as a representative of contemporary fact-oriented professionals, and fiction writers turn out to be their antithesis. The novel defines fiction writers as both agents of morality and informants of essential facts necessary to the social reform of Victorian society, while disqualifying other factualist professionals from such roles. These views imply that Dickens believed his profession had special merits and advantages compared to others. However, they also reflect his anxieties about the unstable and increasingly feminized condition of novelists; in other words, the threat to his own professional and masculine identity. In Hard Times, Dickens was attempting to enhance the respectability of his profession and legitimize its masculinity.
艰难时期维多利亚专业人士的“事实”与“幻想”
摘要:19世纪中期的英格兰见证了职业精神的扩展和成长。在这种背景下阅读,《艰难的时代》(1854)可以被理解为对维多利亚时代的专业人士,尤其是文学专业人士,特别是小说家的批评。托马斯·格拉德格里德是当代以事实为导向的专业人士的代表,而小说作家则是他们的对立面。小说将小说作家定义为道德的代理人和维多利亚社会社会改革所必需的基本事实的线人,同时剥夺了其他现实主义专业人士的资格。这些观点意味着狄更斯相信他的职业与其他职业相比有着特殊的优点和优势。然而,这些也反映了他对小说家不稳定和日益女性化的状况的焦虑;换言之,他对自己职业和男性身份的威胁。在《艰难时期》中,狄更斯试图提高其职业的受人尊敬程度,并使其男子气概合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DICKENS QUARTERLY
DICKENS QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信