The unfolding mystery of the numbers: First and second digits based comparative tests and its application to Ghana’s elections

Q4 Mathematics
Eddie Agyemang, E. N. Nortey, R. Minkah, K. Asah-Asante
{"title":"The unfolding mystery of the numbers: First and second digits based comparative tests and its application to Ghana’s elections","authors":"Eddie Agyemang, E. N. Nortey, R. Minkah, K. Asah-Asante","doi":"10.3233/mas-221418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the use of digits-based test in anomaly detection in presidential elections in Ghana. Even though Ghana has conducted several successful elections to elect presidents, the outcomes of the elections have been challenged in courts on allegations of vote rigging and fraud. It has been established in the literature that for an election to be anomaly free, the following should be satisfied: the distribution of voters turn-out, the winners’ share and total valid votes cast in the election should be uni-modal. Therefore, we assess the applicability of both first and second digits-based tests to aid in the detection of possible anomaly in the 2016 and 2020 presidential election results data in Ghana. The Benford frequency distribution and Spearman rank correlation coefficient tests were used for the analysis of data obtained from the Electoral Commission of Ghana. The results show that the observed first digits distributions of valid vote counts for both New Patriotic Party (NPP) and National Democratic Congress (NDC), and the total valid votes cast (TVVC), in 2016 and 2020 are consistent with the distributional pattern of first digits postulated by Benford’s Law. However, the findings of the distribution of second digits of the valid vote counts for NPP and total valid vote cast in both 2016 and 2020 elections do not satisfy the probability distributional pattern of second digits according to the Benford’s Law. In view of these, we recommend using the first two digits-based tests to check for consistency of possible election anomaly between the first and second digits since it conveys more information.","PeriodicalId":35000,"journal":{"name":"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/mas-221418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study focuses on the use of digits-based test in anomaly detection in presidential elections in Ghana. Even though Ghana has conducted several successful elections to elect presidents, the outcomes of the elections have been challenged in courts on allegations of vote rigging and fraud. It has been established in the literature that for an election to be anomaly free, the following should be satisfied: the distribution of voters turn-out, the winners’ share and total valid votes cast in the election should be uni-modal. Therefore, we assess the applicability of both first and second digits-based tests to aid in the detection of possible anomaly in the 2016 and 2020 presidential election results data in Ghana. The Benford frequency distribution and Spearman rank correlation coefficient tests were used for the analysis of data obtained from the Electoral Commission of Ghana. The results show that the observed first digits distributions of valid vote counts for both New Patriotic Party (NPP) and National Democratic Congress (NDC), and the total valid votes cast (TVVC), in 2016 and 2020 are consistent with the distributional pattern of first digits postulated by Benford’s Law. However, the findings of the distribution of second digits of the valid vote counts for NPP and total valid vote cast in both 2016 and 2020 elections do not satisfy the probability distributional pattern of second digits according to the Benford’s Law. In view of these, we recommend using the first two digits-based tests to check for consistency of possible election anomaly between the first and second digits since it conveys more information.
数字之谜:基于第一和第二位数的比较测试及其在加纳选举中的应用
本研究的重点是基于数字的测试在加纳总统选举异常检测中的应用。尽管加纳已经成功举行了几次总统选举,但选举结果仍因涉嫌操纵选票和舞弊而在法庭上受到质疑。文献中已经确定,为了使选举没有异常现象,应该满足以下条件:选民的分布、获胜者的份额和选举中的有效选票总数应该是单一的。因此,我们评估了基于第一位数和第二位数的测试的适用性,以帮助检测加纳2016年和2020年总统选举结果数据中可能存在的异常。Benford频率分布和Spearman秩相关系数检验用于分析从加纳选举委员会获得的数据。结果表明,2016年和2020年观察到的新爱国党(NPP)和全国民主代表大会(NDC)有效票数的第一位数分布以及有效投票总数(TVVC)与本福德定律假设的第一位数的分布模式一致。然而,2016年和2020年选举中NPP有效票数的第二位数和总有效票数的分布结果并不满足本福德定律规定的第二位数字的概率分布模式。鉴于此,我们建议使用基于前两位数字的测试来检查第一位和第二位数字之间可能的选举异常的一致性,因为它传递了更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Model Assisted Statistics and Applications
Model Assisted Statistics and Applications Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Model Assisted Statistics and Applications is a peer reviewed international journal. Model Assisted Statistics means an improvement of inference and analysis by use of correlated information, or an underlying theoretical or design model. This might be the design, adjustment, estimation, or analytical phase of statistical project. This information may be survey generated or coming from an independent source. Original papers in the field of sampling theory, econometrics, time-series, design of experiments, and multivariate analysis will be preferred. Papers of both applied and theoretical topics are acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信