Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo

IF 0.3 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Organon F Pub Date : 2021-08-30 DOI:10.31577/orgf.2021.28312

S. Predelli

引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This paper discusses the phenomenon of linguistic taboo. It contrasts that phenomenon with the truth-conditional and non-truth-conditional dimensions of meaning, paying particular attention to slurs and coarseness. It then highlights the peculiarities of taboo and its meta-semantic repercussions: taboo is a meaning-related feature that is nevertheless directly associated with the tokening process. In the conclusion, it gestures to the role of taboo within a theory of linguistic action and the standard framework for conversational exchanges. On these results, I am going to end by looking at some of the harms that epistemic injustice inflicts upon its victims.

查看原文本刊更多论文

禁忌：关于禁忌的几点评论

本文讨论了语言禁忌现象。它将这一现象与意义的真实条件维度和非真实条件维度进行了对比，特别注意诋毁和粗糙。然后，它强调了禁忌的特点及其元语义影响：禁忌是一种与意义相关的特征，但与标记过程直接相关。在结论中，它指出了禁忌在语言行为理论和会话交流标准框架中的作用。关于这些结果，我将在最后研究认知不公正对受害者造成的一些伤害。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Organon F PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

20.00%

发文量

审稿时长

38 weeks

期刊介绍： Organon F publishes high-quality articles on the entire range of topics discussed in contemporary analytic philosophy. Accordingly, we invite authors to submit articles that address issues that belong, but are not limited, to philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, philosophy of science, epistemology, metaphysics and philosophical logic. We also consider analytically written articles on ethics, aesthetics, social philosophy, political philosophy and history of philosophy. The principal aim is to publish original articles that meet the standards typical of analytic philosophy, primarily those of conceptual clarity, precision and soundness of argumentation.