{"title":"Doing Power Threatening Acts (PTAs) in ancient China","authors":"Xingchen Shen, Xinren Chen","doi":"10.1075/JHP.17002.SHE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examines an unexplored type of speech act named jian, which took place uniquely in the\n context of ancient China. Taking it as a Power Threatening Act rather than a commonly studied Face Threatening Act, this study\n examined remonstrators’ strategic modulation of their jian, and the factors that might have influenced the choice\n of modulation strategies. The data come from Zizhi Tongjian. The major findings are as follows: first, the speech\n act of jian contained both ritualised and non-ritualised aspects; second, remonstrators would adopt different\n modulation strategies when performing jian, which can be generally divided into three modulation orientations of\n redress, aggravation, and a combination of redress and aggravation, with different degrees of rituality; third, the choices of\n modulation strategies reflected the game playing of the requirements of affiliational propriety and illocutionary effect within\n the jian act.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.17002.SHE","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
This study examines an unexplored type of speech act named jian, which took place uniquely in the
context of ancient China. Taking it as a Power Threatening Act rather than a commonly studied Face Threatening Act, this study
examined remonstrators’ strategic modulation of their jian, and the factors that might have influenced the choice
of modulation strategies. The data come from Zizhi Tongjian. The major findings are as follows: first, the speech
act of jian contained both ritualised and non-ritualised aspects; second, remonstrators would adopt different
modulation strategies when performing jian, which can be generally divided into three modulation orientations of
redress, aggravation, and a combination of redress and aggravation, with different degrees of rituality; third, the choices of
modulation strategies reflected the game playing of the requirements of affiliational propriety and illocutionary effect within
the jian act.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.