What Happens to COVID-19 Data After the Pandemic? Socio-Technical Lessons

Katina Michael;Roba Abbas
{"title":"What Happens to COVID-19 Data After the Pandemic? Socio-Technical Lessons","authors":"Katina Michael;Roba Abbas","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2022.3226119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 global pandemic outbreak meant a complete reevaluation of societal interactions, business processes, and government policies. For decades, the scientific and technical communities had contemplated the possibility of an all-out air-borne virus and had postulated how technology might be used in response, for example, in the reduction of transmission rates. In this paper, we examine the Australian COVID-19 technological response, focused initially on using a contact tracing app that would continually be broadcasting for known recorded cases, one nearby smartphone to another, and to the successive deployment of a QR-code-based solution requiring checking in and checking out of a place of congregation, like a closed or open campus setting. Despite the lackluster outcomes of the high-fidelity solutions, government continued, and in some instances, persisted in relying on QR codes for a considerable period. These solutions necessitated the collection of data pertaining to an individual for functioning, prompting a series of questions regarding the collection, storage, dissemination, and use of this data, both at the height of the pandemic and presently. On reflection, was the data effectively used or integrated into the proposed processes? Could the data be utilized in an unauthorized manner? And how might we circumvent its unauthorized use moving forward? Are there any potentially positive use cases that we could envisage? And, significantly, in the context of this piece, what are the broader socio-technical lessons or learnings that could be derived from such implementations that can be reinstituted into the design of future health-oriented systems? This paper provides an overview of Australia’s contact tracing app, from here on referred to as COVIDSafe, and the subsequent use of QR Codes that were state based and governed by the Services arm of the Australian Government, to present design insights relevant to both the Australian context and beyond.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"3 4","pages":"242-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8566059/9987552/09987511.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9987511/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 global pandemic outbreak meant a complete reevaluation of societal interactions, business processes, and government policies. For decades, the scientific and technical communities had contemplated the possibility of an all-out air-borne virus and had postulated how technology might be used in response, for example, in the reduction of transmission rates. In this paper, we examine the Australian COVID-19 technological response, focused initially on using a contact tracing app that would continually be broadcasting for known recorded cases, one nearby smartphone to another, and to the successive deployment of a QR-code-based solution requiring checking in and checking out of a place of congregation, like a closed or open campus setting. Despite the lackluster outcomes of the high-fidelity solutions, government continued, and in some instances, persisted in relying on QR codes for a considerable period. These solutions necessitated the collection of data pertaining to an individual for functioning, prompting a series of questions regarding the collection, storage, dissemination, and use of this data, both at the height of the pandemic and presently. On reflection, was the data effectively used or integrated into the proposed processes? Could the data be utilized in an unauthorized manner? And how might we circumvent its unauthorized use moving forward? Are there any potentially positive use cases that we could envisage? And, significantly, in the context of this piece, what are the broader socio-technical lessons or learnings that could be derived from such implementations that can be reinstituted into the design of future health-oriented systems? This paper provides an overview of Australia’s contact tracing app, from here on referred to as COVIDSafe, and the subsequent use of QR Codes that were state based and governed by the Services arm of the Australian Government, to present design insights relevant to both the Australian context and beyond.
大流行后新冠肺炎数据发生了什么?社会技术课程
新冠肺炎全球大流行的爆发意味着对社会互动、商业流程和政府政策的全面重新评估。几十年来,科学和技术界一直在考虑全面的空气传播病毒的可能性,并假设如何利用技术来应对,例如降低传播率。在这篇论文中,我们研究了澳大利亚新冠肺炎的技术应对措施,最初的重点是使用接触者追踪应用程序,该应用程序将持续广播已知的记录病例,从一部附近的智能手机到另一部,以及基于QR代码的解决方案的连续部署,该解决方案需要在封闭或开放的校园环境等聚会场所办理入住和退房手续。尽管高保真解决方案的结果乏善可陈,但政府继续依赖二维码,在某些情况下,政府在相当长的一段时间内一直依赖二维码。这些解决方案需要收集与个人有关的数据才能发挥作用,这引发了一系列关于这些数据的收集、存储、传播和使用的问题,无论是在疫情最严重的时候还是现在。仔细想想,这些数据是否得到了有效利用或融入了拟议的流程?这些数据会被以未经授权的方式使用吗?我们如何避免其未经授权的使用?我们是否可以设想任何潜在的积极用例?而且,重要的是,在这篇文章的背景下,从这些实施中可以获得哪些更广泛的社会技术经验或教训,这些经验或教训可以重新纳入未来面向健康的系统的设计中?本文概述了澳大利亚的接触者追踪应用程序,从现在起被称为COVIDSafe,以及随后使用的基于州并由澳大利亚政府服务部门管理的二维码,以呈现与澳大利亚背景和其他背景相关的设计见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信