{"title":"Paul Ricœur’s hermeneutics as a bridge between aesthetics and ontology","authors":"S. Ivic","doi":"10.4000/ESTETICA.6738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paul Ricœur’s ontology of art is derived from his hermeneutics, and Ricœur’s hermeneutics bridges his idea of aesthetics and ontology. Paul Ricœur’s ontology of art (in which the concept of refiguration plays a central role) sheds a new light in understanding and experiencing works of art. Ricœur discusses the metaphorical reference of poetic texts that opens up the realm of possible worlds. This idea of metaphoric reference can be extended to works of art as well. Both fictional narratives and artworks may be defined by the formula seeing as, and this formula represents their ontological status that may be defined as being as. Paul Ricœur argues that non-linguistic symbolic systems such as gestures, sounds and pictures also have the power to make and remake the world. Ricœur’s narrative theory can be applied to both to literature and visual arts as it identifies narrative capacity of artworks. Ricœur introduces the concept of refiguration that includes the transformation of reality, which is first prefigured in the consciousness of the author (mimesis 1). It is then configured in the artwork (mimesis 2), and finally into the experience of the viewer or listener of the artwork (mimesis 3), which leads to comprehension.","PeriodicalId":53954,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di Estetica","volume":"1 1","pages":"66-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di Estetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/ESTETICA.6738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Paul Ricœur’s ontology of art is derived from his hermeneutics, and Ricœur’s hermeneutics bridges his idea of aesthetics and ontology. Paul Ricœur’s ontology of art (in which the concept of refiguration plays a central role) sheds a new light in understanding and experiencing works of art. Ricœur discusses the metaphorical reference of poetic texts that opens up the realm of possible worlds. This idea of metaphoric reference can be extended to works of art as well. Both fictional narratives and artworks may be defined by the formula seeing as, and this formula represents their ontological status that may be defined as being as. Paul Ricœur argues that non-linguistic symbolic systems such as gestures, sounds and pictures also have the power to make and remake the world. Ricœur’s narrative theory can be applied to both to literature and visual arts as it identifies narrative capacity of artworks. Ricœur introduces the concept of refiguration that includes the transformation of reality, which is first prefigured in the consciousness of the author (mimesis 1). It is then configured in the artwork (mimesis 2), and finally into the experience of the viewer or listener of the artwork (mimesis 3), which leads to comprehension.
Paul Ricœur的艺术本体论源于他的解释学,Ricōur解释学将他的美学思想与本体论联系在一起。Paul Ricœur的艺术本体论(其中重塑的概念起着核心作用)为理解和体验艺术作品提供了新的视角。Ricōur讨论了诗歌文本的隐喻参考,打开了可能世界的领域。这种隐喻参考的思想也可以扩展到艺术作品中。虚构叙事和艺术品都可以用“视为”这个公式来定义,这个公式代表了它们的本体论地位,可以被定义为“存在”。Paul Ricœur认为,手势、声音和图片等非语言符号系统也有能力创造和重塑世界。Ricœur的叙事理论可以应用于文学和视觉艺术,因为它确定了艺术品的叙事能力。Ricœur介绍了改造的概念,其中包括对现实的改造,这首先是在作者的意识中预先设想的(模仿1)。然后,它被配置在艺术品中(模仿2),并最终被配置到艺术品的观看者或听众的体验中(模仿3),这导致理解。