Comparison of long-term results following ureteroscopic stone fragmentation with removal versus stone dusting without removal

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
D. Golomb, A. Shvero, Hamad Mahajna, O. Levi, H. Goldberg, S. Tapiero, Y. Stabholz, Paz Lotan, A. Darawsha, Y. Ehrlich, N. Kleinmann, V. Khasminsky, D. Zilberman, H. Winkler, D. Lifshitz
{"title":"Comparison of long-term results following ureteroscopic stone fragmentation with removal versus stone dusting without removal","authors":"D. Golomb, A. Shvero, Hamad Mahajna, O. Levi, H. Goldberg, S. Tapiero, Y. Stabholz, Paz Lotan, A. Darawsha, Y. Ehrlich, N. Kleinmann, V. Khasminsky, D. Zilberman, H. Winkler, D. Lifshitz","doi":"10.1177/20514158221088452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To compare long-term results following ureteroscopic stone fragmentation and removal versus stone dusting. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent ureteroscopy for renal calculi at two high-volume tertiary centres between 2012 and 2013, therefore allowing long-term follow-up. The surgeons differed in their technique, some performing dusting for the most part and the others fragmentation. Inclusion criteria were stone free at the first follow-up and the sole use of laser lithotripsy is either by dusting or by fragmentation. Operative and post-operative data as well as re-treatment rates were compared between the groups. Stone-free rates and long-term stone recurrence rates were analysed by a single radiologist blinded to the treatment technique. Between 2012 and 2013, 669 ureteroscopies were performed at both centres. The study group included 100 patients, which met the inclusion criteria, equally distributed between dusting and fragmentation. The cumulative stone diameter in patients treated with dusting was significantly larger (12.7 mm versus 17 mm, p = 0.006). Operative time was shorter in patients treated with dusting (56 minutes versus 47.2 minutes, p = 0.6). The mean follow-up was 58.9 (standard deviation (SD) 17.2) and 69.4 (SD 13.8) months for the fragmentation and dusting-treated patients, respectively( p = 0.06). The long-term recurrence rate in the fragmentation group was 22% compared to 38% in the dusting group ( p = 0 .08). Most of the patients in the dusting group required a repeat ureteroscopy during their follow-up (28% versus 6%, p = 0.003). A multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the fragmentation was not associated with a lower stone recurrence rate when compared to dusting (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.199-1.810, p = 0.3). The recurrence rate of renal stones was not significantly influenced by the choice of surgical techniques. However, dusting was associated with a greater need for repeat ureteroscopy than fragmentation with removal. Not applicable","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221088452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To compare long-term results following ureteroscopic stone fragmentation and removal versus stone dusting. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent ureteroscopy for renal calculi at two high-volume tertiary centres between 2012 and 2013, therefore allowing long-term follow-up. The surgeons differed in their technique, some performing dusting for the most part and the others fragmentation. Inclusion criteria were stone free at the first follow-up and the sole use of laser lithotripsy is either by dusting or by fragmentation. Operative and post-operative data as well as re-treatment rates were compared between the groups. Stone-free rates and long-term stone recurrence rates were analysed by a single radiologist blinded to the treatment technique. Between 2012 and 2013, 669 ureteroscopies were performed at both centres. The study group included 100 patients, which met the inclusion criteria, equally distributed between dusting and fragmentation. The cumulative stone diameter in patients treated with dusting was significantly larger (12.7 mm versus 17 mm, p = 0.006). Operative time was shorter in patients treated with dusting (56 minutes versus 47.2 minutes, p = 0.6). The mean follow-up was 58.9 (standard deviation (SD) 17.2) and 69.4 (SD 13.8) months for the fragmentation and dusting-treated patients, respectively( p = 0.06). The long-term recurrence rate in the fragmentation group was 22% compared to 38% in the dusting group ( p = 0 .08). Most of the patients in the dusting group required a repeat ureteroscopy during their follow-up (28% versus 6%, p = 0.003). A multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the fragmentation was not associated with a lower stone recurrence rate when compared to dusting (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.199-1.810, p = 0.3). The recurrence rate of renal stones was not significantly influenced by the choice of surgical techniques. However, dusting was associated with a greater need for repeat ureteroscopy than fragmentation with removal. Not applicable
输尿管镜碎石术后取石与不取石取石远期疗效比较
比较输尿管镜碎石术和取石术与取石术后的长期疗效。我们对2012年至2013年间在两个高容量三级中心接受输尿管镜治疗肾结石的患者进行了回顾性分析,因此可以进行长期随访。外科医生的技术各不相同,有些人在大部分时间里进行除尘,另一些人则进行碎片化。纳入标准是在第一次随访时无结石,激光碎石术的唯一用途是除尘或碎石术。比较两组的手术和术后数据以及再治疗率。由一名不了解治疗技术的放射科医生分析结石的无结石率和长期结石复发率。2012年至2013年间,两个中心共进行了669次输尿管镜检查。研究组包括100名符合纳入标准的患者,平均分布在除尘和碎片之间。接受除尘治疗的患者的累积结石直径明显更大(12.7 mm对17 mm,p=0.006)。接受除尘治疗患者的手术时间更短(56分钟对47.2分钟,p=0.06)。碎片化和除尘治疗的平均随访时间分别为58.9(标准差(SD)17.2)和69.4(SD 13.8)个月,碎石组的长期复发率为22%,而除尘组为38%(p=0.08)。除尘组的大多数患者在随访期间需要重复输尿管镜检查(28%对6%,p=0.003)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,碎石与较低的结石复发率无关与除尘相比(OR 0.6,95%CI 0.199-1.810,p=0.3)。肾结石的复发率不受手术技术选择的显著影响。然而,与碎片切除相比,除尘与更需要重复输尿管镜检查有关。不适用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信