CYBER-NOTARIES FROM A CONTEMPORARY LEGAL PERSPECTIVE: A PARADOX IN INDONESIAN LAWS AND THE MARGINAL COMPROMISES TO FIND EQUILIBRIUM

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
David Tan
{"title":"CYBER-NOTARIES FROM A CONTEMPORARY LEGAL PERSPECTIVE: A PARADOX IN INDONESIAN LAWS AND THE MARGINAL COMPROMISES TO FIND EQUILIBRIUM","authors":"David Tan","doi":"10.15742/ILREV.V10N2.635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notaries in Indonesia have existed since the colonial period. Changes in technology and the continuous evolution of information bring a flow of change in all aspects of life, including the legal sector. However, the position of notaries in Indonesia has not undergone significant changes despite ongoing advancements. The promulgation of Law No. 2 of 2014 formally introduced the term “cyber notary” to Indonesian law. However, the idea of cyber notary is not practical because of legal obstacles that seem to form a legal paradox. This work analyzes the position of cyber notaries in Indonesia’s positive legal order and the challenges, adaptations, and compromises actually made to implement cyber notaries in Indonesia. Normative–juridical legal research is adopted as a research method by examining various legal theories and performing comparisons of related laws. This work also presents examples of successful cyber notary implementations from several countries. Results reveal that the implementation of cyber notaries in Indonesia has yet to meet expectations because interrelated laws still create legal paradoxes. This condition results in the inability of notaries in Indonesia to fully evolve into cyber notaries. Recommendations for stakeholders are presented as valuable insights.","PeriodicalId":13484,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15742/ILREV.V10N2.635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Notaries in Indonesia have existed since the colonial period. Changes in technology and the continuous evolution of information bring a flow of change in all aspects of life, including the legal sector. However, the position of notaries in Indonesia has not undergone significant changes despite ongoing advancements. The promulgation of Law No. 2 of 2014 formally introduced the term “cyber notary” to Indonesian law. However, the idea of cyber notary is not practical because of legal obstacles that seem to form a legal paradox. This work analyzes the position of cyber notaries in Indonesia’s positive legal order and the challenges, adaptations, and compromises actually made to implement cyber notaries in Indonesia. Normative–juridical legal research is adopted as a research method by examining various legal theories and performing comparisons of related laws. This work also presents examples of successful cyber notary implementations from several countries. Results reveal that the implementation of cyber notaries in Indonesia has yet to meet expectations because interrelated laws still create legal paradoxes. This condition results in the inability of notaries in Indonesia to fully evolve into cyber notaries. Recommendations for stakeholders are presented as valuable insights.
当代法律视野下的网络国家:印尼法律的悖论与寻求平衡的边际妥协
印度尼西亚的公证员自殖民时期就已存在。技术的变化和信息的不断演变给生活的各个方面带来了变化,包括法律部门。然而,尽管不断取得进展,但印度尼西亚公证人的地位并没有发生重大变化。2014年第2号法律的颁布正式将“网络公证人”一词引入印尼法律。然而,由于法律障碍似乎形成了一个法律悖论,网络公证的想法并不现实。这项工作分析了网络公证员在印度尼西亚积极法律秩序中的地位,以及在印度尼西亚实施网络公证员所面临的挑战、适应和妥协。规范-司法法律研究是一种研究方法,通过审查各种法律理论并对相关法律进行比较。这项工作还介绍了几个国家成功实施网络公证的例子。结果显示,印度尼西亚网络公证的实施尚未达到预期,因为相互关联的法律仍然会产生法律悖论。这种情况导致印尼的公证人无法完全发展成为网络公证人。向利益相关者提出的建议是有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信