{"title":"Does shared leadership fosters taking charge behaviors? A post-heroic leadership perspective in the public sector higher educational institutes","authors":"A. Bilal, T. Fatima, Muhammad Imran","doi":"10.1108/IJPL-04-2019-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to advance the theoretical perspective of complexity leadership paradigm to introduce shared leadership style as a precursor of taking charge behavior in public sector higher educational institutions (HEIs) of Pakistan. Moreover, this study unveils the underlying mechanisms of the climate of initiative and psychological safety for clarifying the link of shared leadership and taking charge.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe multi-source and multi-wave data were analyzed by employing double mediation analysis (PROCESS Model 4); using 282 valid responses obtained from a proportionate stratified sample of faculty members working in public sector HEIs of Pakistan.\n\n\nFindings\nThe result indicates that shared leadership is a suitable style for governing the public sector HEIs and it fosters taking charge behavior in teaching faculty. Additionally, shared leadership creates climates that support initiatives and are psychologically safe that set stage for taking charge behaviors in teaching faculty of public sector HEIs of Pakistan.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research has filled the gap of focusing on more collaborative leadership styles instead of traditional vertical leadership practices in public sector HEIs of Pakistan. Theoretically, this study suggests new insights into the contextual antecedents and mediating mechanisms of taking charge behaviors.\n","PeriodicalId":43080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Leadership","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJPL-04-2019-0016","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-04-2019-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to advance the theoretical perspective of complexity leadership paradigm to introduce shared leadership style as a precursor of taking charge behavior in public sector higher educational institutions (HEIs) of Pakistan. Moreover, this study unveils the underlying mechanisms of the climate of initiative and psychological safety for clarifying the link of shared leadership and taking charge.
Design/methodology/approach
The multi-source and multi-wave data were analyzed by employing double mediation analysis (PROCESS Model 4); using 282 valid responses obtained from a proportionate stratified sample of faculty members working in public sector HEIs of Pakistan.
Findings
The result indicates that shared leadership is a suitable style for governing the public sector HEIs and it fosters taking charge behavior in teaching faculty. Additionally, shared leadership creates climates that support initiatives and are psychologically safe that set stage for taking charge behaviors in teaching faculty of public sector HEIs of Pakistan.
Originality/value
This research has filled the gap of focusing on more collaborative leadership styles instead of traditional vertical leadership practices in public sector HEIs of Pakistan. Theoretically, this study suggests new insights into the contextual antecedents and mediating mechanisms of taking charge behaviors.
目的本文旨在提出复杂性领导范式的理论视角,引入共享领导风格作为巴基斯坦公立高等教育机构负责行为的前兆。此外,这项研究揭示了主动性和心理安全气氛的潜在机制,以澄清共同领导和负责之间的联系。设计/方法论/方法采用双重中介分析(PROCESS Model 4)对多源和多波数据进行分析;结果表明,共享领导是管理公共部门高等学校的一种合适的方式,它促进了教师的负责行为。此外,共同领导创造了支持倡议和心理安全的氛围,为巴基斯坦公共部门高等学校的教师负责行为奠定了基础。原创/价值这项研究填补了巴基斯坦公共部门高级学校关注更多协作领导风格而非传统垂直领导实践的空白。从理论上讲,这项研究对接管行为的上下文前因和中介机制提出了新的见解。