Distinguishing Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Electroencephalography Records

IF 1 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

gazi university journal of science Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.35378/gujs.1229166

I. Umut, Hakan Üstünel, Güven Çentik, E. Uçar, L. Öztürk

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to find out whether electroencephalographic (EEG) frequency bands can be used to distinguish people with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from those who do not have it. 11842 different cases taken from 121 patients suffering from OSA were combined with the case study of 30-person control group without sleep apnea. Apneas were highlighted at the respiration-record channels and EEG records which are concurrent with abnormal respiration cases were extracted from C4-A1 and C3-A2. Following that, they were examined with Fourier and Wavelet Transforms using a new software that was developed by us. The percentage values of Delta (0, 5-4 Hz), Theta (4-8 Hz), Alpha (8-13 Hz) and Beta (13-30 Hz) frequency bands were evaluated with the help of t-test and ROC Analysis to differentiate between apneas. The C3-A2 Beta (%) frequency level gave the highest distinguishing asset (AUC=0.662; p

查看原文本刊更多论文

用脑电图记录鉴别阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停

在这项研究中，旨在了解脑电图（EEG）频带是否可以用来区分阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停（OSA）患者和无OSA患者。将121名OSA患者的11842例不同病例与30名无睡眠呼吸暂停对照组的病例研究相结合。Apneas在呼吸记录通道处被突出显示，并且从C4-A1和C3-A2中提取与异常呼吸病例同时发生的EEG记录。然后，使用我们开发的一个新软件，用傅立叶变换和小波变换对它们进行检查。借助t检验和ROC分析，评估Delta（0-5-4 Hz）、Theta（4-8 Hz）、Alpha（8-13 Hz）和Beta（13-30 Hz）频带的百分比值，以区分呼吸暂停。C3-A2β（%）频率水平给出了最高的区分资产（AUC=0.662；p

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

gazi university journal of science MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The scope of the “Gazi University Journal of Science” comprises such as original research on all aspects of basic science, engineering and technology. Original research results, scientific reviews and short communication notes in various fields of science and technology are considered for publication. The publication language of the journal is English. Manuscripts previously published in another journal are not accepted. Manuscripts with a suitable balance of practice and theory are preferred. A review article is expected to give in-depth information and satisfying evaluation of a specific scientific or technologic subject, supported with an extensive list of sources. Short communication notes prepared by researchers who would like to share the first outcomes of their on-going, original research work are welcome.