Identifying critical challenges to lean construction adoption

IF 3.1 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Arpita Singh, Vimal Kumar, Ankesh Mittal, Pratima Verma
{"title":"Identifying critical challenges to lean construction adoption","authors":"Arpita Singh, Vimal Kumar, Ankesh Mittal, Pratima Verma","doi":"10.1108/ci-09-2022-0229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to set out to identify and evaluate potential obstacles to successfully implementing lean construction (LC) as a result.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSeveral indicators were recognized as major obstacles following an exhaustive assessment of the literature and a multicriteria decision analysis based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of information obtained from a questionnaire survey that was directed to practitioners in the Indian construction industry.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results of this AHP model suggest that “Managerial” and “Inadequate resources” categories with a priority weight of “0.361” and “0.309” have the highest levels of influence, respectively, while “Inadequate knowledge” and “just in time (JIT)” categories with a priority weight of “0.053” and “0.034” have the lowest levels of influence, respectively.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nConstruction companies can use the study’s findings as a guide to determine whether they are ready to embrace LC, learn more about the components needed for implementation or investigate any challenges that may arise. These businesses can then create plans to promote the adoption and application of the lean philosophy.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe Indian construction industry may see great success with LC management initiatives. LC concepts have been adopted by many nations, but during the past 20 years, there has only appeared to be a limited amount of lean implementation in the Indian construction industry. It seems that several structural and cultural barriers are preventing its effective implementation. Organizations will not be able to determine what improvement efforts are required, where these efforts should be directed or which initiatives could provide the best outcomes if they are unaware of the elements that influence the effective implementation of LC.\n","PeriodicalId":45580,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation-England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation-England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-09-2022-0229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to set out to identify and evaluate potential obstacles to successfully implementing lean construction (LC) as a result. Design/methodology/approach Several indicators were recognized as major obstacles following an exhaustive assessment of the literature and a multicriteria decision analysis based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of information obtained from a questionnaire survey that was directed to practitioners in the Indian construction industry. Findings The results of this AHP model suggest that “Managerial” and “Inadequate resources” categories with a priority weight of “0.361” and “0.309” have the highest levels of influence, respectively, while “Inadequate knowledge” and “just in time (JIT)” categories with a priority weight of “0.053” and “0.034” have the lowest levels of influence, respectively. Research limitations/implications Construction companies can use the study’s findings as a guide to determine whether they are ready to embrace LC, learn more about the components needed for implementation or investigate any challenges that may arise. These businesses can then create plans to promote the adoption and application of the lean philosophy. Originality/value The Indian construction industry may see great success with LC management initiatives. LC concepts have been adopted by many nations, but during the past 20 years, there has only appeared to be a limited amount of lean implementation in the Indian construction industry. It seems that several structural and cultural barriers are preventing its effective implementation. Organizations will not be able to determine what improvement efforts are required, where these efforts should be directed or which initiatives could provide the best outcomes if they are unaware of the elements that influence the effective implementation of LC.
确定采用精益施工的关键挑战
目的本研究旨在识别和评估成功实施精益施工的潜在障碍。设计/方法/方法在对文献进行详尽评估后,根据从针对印度建筑业从业者的问卷调查中获得的信息的层次分析法(AHP)进行了多准则决策分析,几个指标被认为是主要障碍。该AHP模型的结果表明,优先级权重分别为“0.361”和“0.309”的“管理”和“资源不足”类别的影响力最高,而优先级权重为“0.053”和“0.034”的“知识不足”和“准时制”类别的影响最低。研究局限性/含义建筑公司可以利用研究结果作为指导,确定他们是否准备好接受LC,了解更多实施所需的组件,或调查可能出现的任何挑战。然后,这些企业可以制定计划,促进精益哲学的采用和应用。创意/价值印度建筑业可能会在LC管理举措方面取得巨大成功。LC概念已被许多国家采用,但在过去20年中 多年来,印度建筑业似乎只有有限的精益实施。似乎有一些结构性和文化障碍阻碍了其有效实施。如果组织不知道影响LC有效实施的因素,它们将无法确定需要哪些改进努力,这些努力应该指向哪里,或者哪些举措可以提供最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction Innovation-England
Construction Innovation-England CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信