Clinical Significance of Induction of Atrial Fibrillation after Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Q4 Medicine
O. S. Stychynskyi, P. O. Almiz, A. Topchii
{"title":"Clinical Significance of Induction of Atrial Fibrillation after Pulmonary Vein Isolation","authors":"O. S. Stychynskyi, P. O. Almiz, A. Topchii","doi":"10.30702/ujcvs/22.30(01)/sa001-5963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pulmonary vein isolation is a standard for catheter treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). As for the need for additional impact on the arrhythmogenic substrate in the atria, there is no consensus or unified technique. \nThe aim. To study the efficiency of AF induction by frequent atrial pacing as a prognostic criterium for arrhythmia recurrence in the long term after catheter treatment. \nMaterials and methods. We analyzed 55 catheter procedures of AF ablation in 55 patients (27 women, mean age 52 ± 6.8 years) without structural heart disease. There were 28 patients and 27 patients with paroxysmal and persistent arrhythmia, respectively. Concomitant diseases (coronary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes) were reported in 30 (54.5%) cases. The technique of the procedure was as follows. At first, the pulmonary veins were isolated. After that frequent stimulation was carried out from two sites with a cycle of 300 ms for 10 seconds, with a phased shortening by 20 ms, until atrial refractoriness was achieved. Arrhythmia was considered induced if its episode lasted more than 30 seconds. In case of induction of AF and absence of its spontaneous termination within the pre-specified time, the search and ablation of the areas with fragmented activity were performed. There were no additional effects on the substrate in the atria. Recurrence of AF was defined as the occurrence of AF within 3 months after ablation. \nResults. Atrial fibrillation was induced in 9 (16.4%) of 55 patients. During the follow-up period lasting 12 to 26 months, recurrent arrhythmia occurred in 11 (20%) of 55 patients, including 3 (33.3%) of 9 with induced AF, and 8 (17.4 %) of 46 in whom it was not induced (relative risk 1.9; odds ratio 2.4; 95% confidence interval 16.5-23.5). Comparison of the recurrence rate depending on the form of arrhythmia did not reveal significant differences: the relative risk was 2.2 for persistent form and 1.5 for paroxysmal form (P > 0.05). \nConclusions. Our results indicate that in cases where AF was induced after pulmonary vein isolation, the likelihood of its subsequent recurrence was twice as high as in cases when it was not induced. This trend was observed both in paroxysmal and persistent forms of arrhythmia.","PeriodicalId":33680,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/22.30(01)/sa001-5963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulmonary vein isolation is a standard for catheter treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). As for the need for additional impact on the arrhythmogenic substrate in the atria, there is no consensus or unified technique. The aim. To study the efficiency of AF induction by frequent atrial pacing as a prognostic criterium for arrhythmia recurrence in the long term after catheter treatment. Materials and methods. We analyzed 55 catheter procedures of AF ablation in 55 patients (27 women, mean age 52 ± 6.8 years) without structural heart disease. There were 28 patients and 27 patients with paroxysmal and persistent arrhythmia, respectively. Concomitant diseases (coronary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes) were reported in 30 (54.5%) cases. The technique of the procedure was as follows. At first, the pulmonary veins were isolated. After that frequent stimulation was carried out from two sites with a cycle of 300 ms for 10 seconds, with a phased shortening by 20 ms, until atrial refractoriness was achieved. Arrhythmia was considered induced if its episode lasted more than 30 seconds. In case of induction of AF and absence of its spontaneous termination within the pre-specified time, the search and ablation of the areas with fragmented activity were performed. There were no additional effects on the substrate in the atria. Recurrence of AF was defined as the occurrence of AF within 3 months after ablation. Results. Atrial fibrillation was induced in 9 (16.4%) of 55 patients. During the follow-up period lasting 12 to 26 months, recurrent arrhythmia occurred in 11 (20%) of 55 patients, including 3 (33.3%) of 9 with induced AF, and 8 (17.4 %) of 46 in whom it was not induced (relative risk 1.9; odds ratio 2.4; 95% confidence interval 16.5-23.5). Comparison of the recurrence rate depending on the form of arrhythmia did not reveal significant differences: the relative risk was 2.2 for persistent form and 1.5 for paroxysmal form (P > 0.05). Conclusions. Our results indicate that in cases where AF was induced after pulmonary vein isolation, the likelihood of its subsequent recurrence was twice as high as in cases when it was not induced. This trend was observed both in paroxysmal and persistent forms of arrhythmia.
肺静脉隔离后诱发心房颤动的临床意义
肺静脉隔离是心房颤动(AF)导管治疗的标准。至于是否需要对心房中的致心律失常基质产生额外的影响,目前还没有达成共识或统一的技术。目标。研究频繁心房起搏诱发房颤的有效性,作为导管治疗后心律失常长期复发的预后标准。材料和方法。我们分析了55名无结构性心脏病患者(27名女性,平均年龄52±6.8岁)的55例房颤导管消融手术。发作性心律失常28例,持续性心律失常27例。30例(54.5%)病例报告了合并疾病(冠心病、高血压、糖尿病)。手术技术如下。起初,肺静脉是孤立的。此后,从两个部位进行频繁刺激,周期为300ms,持续10秒,分阶段缩短20ms,直到达到心房不应症。如果心律失常发作持续30秒以上,则认为心律失常是诱发的。如果诱发房颤且在预先规定的时间内没有自发终止,则对具有碎片活动的区域进行搜索和消融。心房基质没有其他影响。房颤复发定义为消融后3个月内发生房颤。后果55例患者中有9例(16.4%)发生心房颤动。在持续12至26个月的随访期间,55例患者中有11例(20%)发生复发性心律失常,其中9例中有3例(33.3%)发生诱发性房颤,46例患者中有8例(17.4%)未诱发心律失常(相对风险1.9;比值比2.4;95%置信区间16.5-23.5)。根据心律失常的形式对复发率进行比较,没有发现显著差异:持续性心律失常的相对风险为2.2,阵发性心律失常的相对风险为1.5(P>0.05)。结论。我们的研究结果表明,在肺静脉隔离后诱发房颤的病例中,其随后复发的可能性是未诱发的病例的两倍。这种趋势在阵发性和持续性心律失常中都有观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信