Engineering cellular systems: modify, repair, but not at all costs. Which ethical benchmarks?

Q2 Arts and Humanities
M. Thiel
{"title":"Engineering cellular systems: modify, repair, but not at all costs. Which ethical benchmarks?","authors":"M. Thiel","doi":"10.4081/mem.2023.1226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution examines the engineering of molecular and cellular system from an ethical point of view. It is possible today to modify, repair, and treat (…) but it must not be at all costs. Fascination must not blind us to the ethical issues at stake. In order to take on these challenges, the author proposes five sets of intertwined principles suggesting systematic and systemic levels of reasoning. The first set concerns recognition of a free, dignified, autonomous but also vulnerable human being who is at the centre of the ethical approach. A second set aims at the usefulness and reliability of the implemented engineering. Linked to the first two sets, the third one points to the place of information and education, assuming the uncertainties inherent in all human knowledge and the rapid evolution of cellular and molecular engineering techniques and their repercussions on the whole of society. A fourth set refers to social and societal values: justice, equal access to care, non-discrimination, cost of treatment and solidarity... and in addition: cultural and religious perspectives which can sometimes be brakes, sometimes accelerators... The last principle brings these different ethical issues together by stressing the obligation to take a global view: integrating time and space, and the opened prospects and their implications at the anthropological, social and societal, political, environmental, economic, cultural and religious levels.","PeriodicalId":36708,"journal":{"name":"Medicina e Morale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina e Morale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2023.1226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This contribution examines the engineering of molecular and cellular system from an ethical point of view. It is possible today to modify, repair, and treat (…) but it must not be at all costs. Fascination must not blind us to the ethical issues at stake. In order to take on these challenges, the author proposes five sets of intertwined principles suggesting systematic and systemic levels of reasoning. The first set concerns recognition of a free, dignified, autonomous but also vulnerable human being who is at the centre of the ethical approach. A second set aims at the usefulness and reliability of the implemented engineering. Linked to the first two sets, the third one points to the place of information and education, assuming the uncertainties inherent in all human knowledge and the rapid evolution of cellular and molecular engineering techniques and their repercussions on the whole of society. A fourth set refers to social and societal values: justice, equal access to care, non-discrimination, cost of treatment and solidarity... and in addition: cultural and religious perspectives which can sometimes be brakes, sometimes accelerators... The last principle brings these different ethical issues together by stressing the obligation to take a global view: integrating time and space, and the opened prospects and their implications at the anthropological, social and societal, political, environmental, economic, cultural and religious levels.
工程蜂窝系统:修改、修复,但不是不惜一切代价。哪些道德基准?
这篇文章从伦理学的角度考察了分子和细胞系统的工程。今天,修改、修复和处理(…)是可能的,但决不能不惜一切代价。着迷决不能使我们忽视所涉及的道德问题。为了应对这些挑战,作者提出了五套相互交织的原则,提出了系统和系统的推理水平。第一组涉及承认一个自由、有尊严、自主但也脆弱的人,他是道德方法的核心。第二组旨在实现工程的有用性和可靠性。与前两组相关,第三组指向信息和教育的位置,假设所有人类知识中固有的不确定性以及细胞和分子工程技术的快速发展及其对整个社会的影响。第四套涉及社会和社会价值观:正义、平等获得护理、不歧视、治疗费用和团结。。。此外:文化和宗教观点有时可能是刹车,有时是加速器。。。最后一项原则通过强调采取全球观点的义务,将这些不同的伦理问题结合在一起:整合时间和空间,以及开放的前景及其在人类学、社会和社会、政治、环境、经济、文化和宗教层面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina e Morale
Medicina e Morale Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信