Promoting Explanations in Narratives

Q4 Social Sciences
C. Westby
{"title":"Promoting Explanations in Narratives","authors":"C. Westby","doi":"10.1177/10483950221136353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children’s skills in telling narratives are positively related to language (e.g., Cooper et al., 1992; Mallan, 1991), to reading and writing skills (e.g., Dickinson & Tabors, 2002; Reese et al., 2010), and to children’s overall school performance (Snow et al., 1998). Moreover, quality of narratives told at 5 years of age (Griffin et al., 2004), or retold at 6 years of age (Reese et al., 2010), has been shown to contribute to reading fluency and comprehension at 8 years of age. Although children are capable of explaining events and behavior in their everyday interactions (Hickling & Wellman, 2001; Veneziano, 2001) and may succeed in first order false belief tasks at 4 to 5 years (Wellman et al., 2001), explicit reference to mental or epistemic states in self-constructed narratives is rarely observed before 6 to 7 years (Peterson & Slaughter, 2006). Until 6 to 7 years of age, children provide few explanations and evaluations of events, and it is not until 8 to 9 years that the majority of children express these elements (e.g., Berman, 2004, 2009; Berman & Slobin, 1994). From the age of 8 to 9 years, children begin to spontaneously refer to the characters’ internal states to explain their behaviors and the story events (Bamberg, 1994), and it is even later that they express false beliefs that require the characters’ beliefs to be clearly differentiated from the state of the world or to talk about the different points of view of the characters about the same event (KielarTurska, 1999; Küntay & Nakamura, 2004; Veneziano & Hudelot, 2009). Given the centrality of narrative skills in children’s development, many studies have focused on promoting children’s narrative skills using different methodologies, settings, and durations of the intervention. In this study, the authors used an intervention they titled short conversational intervention (SCI). The SCI was chosen because, besides being short and simple to administer, it has three features likely to promote the inferential content of children’s narratives. First, the SCI focuses children’s attention on the causal structure of the story, stimulating them to go beyond the perceptual details present in the pictures. Second, by A newsletter dedicated to speech & language in school-age children","PeriodicalId":39491,"journal":{"name":"Word of Mouth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Word of Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10483950221136353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children’s skills in telling narratives are positively related to language (e.g., Cooper et al., 1992; Mallan, 1991), to reading and writing skills (e.g., Dickinson & Tabors, 2002; Reese et al., 2010), and to children’s overall school performance (Snow et al., 1998). Moreover, quality of narratives told at 5 years of age (Griffin et al., 2004), or retold at 6 years of age (Reese et al., 2010), has been shown to contribute to reading fluency and comprehension at 8 years of age. Although children are capable of explaining events and behavior in their everyday interactions (Hickling & Wellman, 2001; Veneziano, 2001) and may succeed in first order false belief tasks at 4 to 5 years (Wellman et al., 2001), explicit reference to mental or epistemic states in self-constructed narratives is rarely observed before 6 to 7 years (Peterson & Slaughter, 2006). Until 6 to 7 years of age, children provide few explanations and evaluations of events, and it is not until 8 to 9 years that the majority of children express these elements (e.g., Berman, 2004, 2009; Berman & Slobin, 1994). From the age of 8 to 9 years, children begin to spontaneously refer to the characters’ internal states to explain their behaviors and the story events (Bamberg, 1994), and it is even later that they express false beliefs that require the characters’ beliefs to be clearly differentiated from the state of the world or to talk about the different points of view of the characters about the same event (KielarTurska, 1999; Küntay & Nakamura, 2004; Veneziano & Hudelot, 2009). Given the centrality of narrative skills in children’s development, many studies have focused on promoting children’s narrative skills using different methodologies, settings, and durations of the intervention. In this study, the authors used an intervention they titled short conversational intervention (SCI). The SCI was chosen because, besides being short and simple to administer, it has three features likely to promote the inferential content of children’s narratives. First, the SCI focuses children’s attention on the causal structure of the story, stimulating them to go beyond the perceptual details present in the pictures. Second, by A newsletter dedicated to speech & language in school-age children
促进叙事中的解释
儿童讲述故事的技能与语言(例如,Cooper等人,1992;Mallan,1991)、阅读和写作技能(例如,Dickinson&Tabors,2002;Reese等人,2010)以及儿童的整体学校表现呈正相关(Snow等人,1998)。此外,在5岁时讲述的故事(Griffin等人,2004年)或在6岁时复述的故事(Reese等人,2010年)的质量已被证明有助于8岁时的阅读流畅性和理解力。尽管儿童能够解释日常互动中的事件和行为(Hickling&Wellman,2001;Veneziano,2001),并可能在4至5岁时成功完成一阶错误信念任务(Wellman et al.,2001)。但在6至7岁之前,很少观察到自构叙事中对心理或认识状态的明确提及(Peterson&Slaughter,2006)。直到6至7岁,儿童对事件的解释和评估很少,直到8至9岁,大多数儿童才表达这些元素(例如,Berman,2004年、2009年;Berman&Slobin,1994年)。从8岁到9岁,孩子们开始自发地参考角色的内部状态来解释他们的行为和故事事件(Bamberg,1994),甚至在后来,他们表达了错误的信念,要求角色的信念与世界状态明确区分开来,或者谈论角色对同一事件的不同观点(KielarTurska,1999;Küntay和Nakamura,2004年;Veneziano和Hudelot,2009年)。鉴于叙事技能在儿童发展中的中心地位,许多研究都集中在使用不同的干预方法、环境和持续时间来提高儿童的叙事技能。在这项研究中,作者使用了一种名为“简短会话干预”(SCI)的干预措施。之所以选择SCI,是因为它除了简短和易于管理之外,还有三个特点可能促进儿童叙事的推理内容。首先,SCI将儿童的注意力集中在故事的因果结构上,激励他们超越图片中的感知细节。第二,通过一份致力于学龄儿童言语和语言的时事通讯
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Word of Mouth
Word of Mouth Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: ...helps frontline clinicians keep up with the latest trends in working with school-age children. Each 16-page issue of bare-bones, down-to-earth information includes reviews, resources, idea swap, and short bits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信