Selecting near-infrared reflection spectroscopy pretreatment methods by chemical components valid and invalid absorption wavebands

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tiancheng Huang, Guimin Cai, Hubin Liu, Zhiyue Feng, Longlian Zhao, Junhui Li
{"title":"Selecting near-infrared reflection spectroscopy pretreatment methods by chemical components valid and invalid absorption wavebands","authors":"Tiancheng Huang, Guimin Cai, Hubin Liu, Zhiyue Feng, Longlian Zhao, Junhui Li","doi":"10.1080/00387010.2022.2136200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An appropriate pretreatment method is crucial to establish a reliable model for near-infrared spectroscopy. It is usually selected by comparing model performance with different pretreatment methods, such as the root mean square error of internal cross-validation or the root mean square error of prediction. When the statistical indexes of the models are similar and indistinguishable, or the results of model calibration and cross-validation are too different, indicating an overfitting situation, it may be due to the selection of an inappropriate pretreatment. In this paper, an approach is proposed to select appropriate pretreatment methods by chemical components valid and invalid absorption wavebands. Due to there being no chemical groups absorption in wavebands of 1250–1350 nm and 1780–1850 nm, they are considered chemical invalid absorption bands. The root mean square distance in the invalid wavebands characterizes the difference in samples’ physical state, such as particle size and instrument error. Except for the invalid absorption band, other wavebands in the near-infrared region are considered chemical valid absorption wavebands. The root mean square distance in the valid absorption wavebands mainly characterize the chemical composition differences between different samples. So, we define effective information rate of spectra. The larger effective information rate of spectra, the more favorable it is to establish a quantitative model. In this study, spectra of 60 wheat powder samples were used to compare seven pretreatment methods. Moreover, the average effective information rates of spectra were calculated for the seven pretreatment methods respectively. The results show that the combination of standard normal variate transformation and first derivative with Savitzky–Golay smoothing is the best. Finally, a comparison of model prediction with different pretreatment methods was made. The results are the same as the former. Therefore, using the effective information rate of spectra for selecting an appropriate near-infrared spectroscopy pretreatment method is practical and can be used not only for near-infrared modeling but also for designing near-infrared instruments as an index for optimization.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00387010.2022.2136200","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract An appropriate pretreatment method is crucial to establish a reliable model for near-infrared spectroscopy. It is usually selected by comparing model performance with different pretreatment methods, such as the root mean square error of internal cross-validation or the root mean square error of prediction. When the statistical indexes of the models are similar and indistinguishable, or the results of model calibration and cross-validation are too different, indicating an overfitting situation, it may be due to the selection of an inappropriate pretreatment. In this paper, an approach is proposed to select appropriate pretreatment methods by chemical components valid and invalid absorption wavebands. Due to there being no chemical groups absorption in wavebands of 1250–1350 nm and 1780–1850 nm, they are considered chemical invalid absorption bands. The root mean square distance in the invalid wavebands characterizes the difference in samples’ physical state, such as particle size and instrument error. Except for the invalid absorption band, other wavebands in the near-infrared region are considered chemical valid absorption wavebands. The root mean square distance in the valid absorption wavebands mainly characterize the chemical composition differences between different samples. So, we define effective information rate of spectra. The larger effective information rate of spectra, the more favorable it is to establish a quantitative model. In this study, spectra of 60 wheat powder samples were used to compare seven pretreatment methods. Moreover, the average effective information rates of spectra were calculated for the seven pretreatment methods respectively. The results show that the combination of standard normal variate transformation and first derivative with Savitzky–Golay smoothing is the best. Finally, a comparison of model prediction with different pretreatment methods was made. The results are the same as the former. Therefore, using the effective information rate of spectra for selecting an appropriate near-infrared spectroscopy pretreatment method is practical and can be used not only for near-infrared modeling but also for designing near-infrared instruments as an index for optimization.
根据化学成分有效和无效吸收波段选择近红外反射光谱预处理方法
摘要适当的预处理方法对于建立可靠的近红外光谱模型至关重要。它通常是通过比较不同预处理方法的模型性能来选择的,例如内部交叉验证的均方根误差或预测的均方根错误。当模型的统计指标相似且无法区分,或者模型校准和交叉验证的结果差异过大,表明存在过拟合情况时,可能是由于选择了不适当的预处理。本文提出了一种根据化学成分有效和无效吸收波段来选择合适的预处理方法的方法。由于在1250–1350的波段中没有化学基团吸收 nm和1780–1850 nm,它们被认为是化学无效吸收带。无效波段中的均方根距离表征了样品物理状态的差异,如粒度和仪器误差。除了无效吸收波段外,近红外区域的其他波段都被认为是化学有效吸收波段。有效吸收波段的均方根距离主要表征不同样品之间的化学成分差异。因此,我们定义了光谱的有效信息率。光谱的有效信息率越大,就越有利于建立定量模型。在本研究中,使用60个小麦粉样品的光谱来比较七种预处理方法。此外,分别计算了七种预处理方法的光谱平均有效信息率。结果表明,标准正态变量变换与Savitzky–Golay平滑的一阶导数相结合是最好的。最后,对不同预处理方法的模型预测进行了比较。结果与前者相同。因此,利用光谱的有效信息率来选择合适的近红外光谱预处理方法是可行的,不仅可以用于近红外建模,还可以用于设计近红外仪器作为优化指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信