Tensile forces and deflections on skylines of cable yarders: comparison of measurements with close-to-catenary predictions

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
L. Bont, Laura Ramstein, F. Frutig, J. Schweier
{"title":"Tensile forces and deflections on skylines of cable yarders: comparison of measurements with close-to-catenary predictions","authors":"L. Bont, Laura Ramstein, F. Frutig, J. Schweier","doi":"10.1080/14942119.2022.2051159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cable-based technologies are the backbone of timber harvesting on steep slopes. To simplify the cable road design process, the QGIS plugin Seilaplan was recently developed. Seilaplan is tailored for Central European cable yarder technology, with standing skylines. To analyze and predict the load path and occurring forces, the close-to-catenary Zweifel approach is implemented in Seilaplan. The aim of this study was to validate the catenary analyses (deflection and skyline tensile force) under realistic, heavy load conditions for multi-span cable roads. The main finding is that sufficient accuracy, for practical applications under real loading configurations and cable road settings, can be achieved by applying the Zweifel approach. This holds for both the predicted static skyline tensile force, for which a deviation of −3.5 % to +12.7 % was measured (root mean square error [RMSE] = 7 kN), and for the deflection, which deviated from measured values by −0.73 m to +0.9 m (RMSE = 0.5 m). A slight limitation of the implemented Zweifel approach is the missing aspect of the mainline loading, in particular for steep spans.","PeriodicalId":55998,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2022.2051159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cable-based technologies are the backbone of timber harvesting on steep slopes. To simplify the cable road design process, the QGIS plugin Seilaplan was recently developed. Seilaplan is tailored for Central European cable yarder technology, with standing skylines. To analyze and predict the load path and occurring forces, the close-to-catenary Zweifel approach is implemented in Seilaplan. The aim of this study was to validate the catenary analyses (deflection and skyline tensile force) under realistic, heavy load conditions for multi-span cable roads. The main finding is that sufficient accuracy, for practical applications under real loading configurations and cable road settings, can be achieved by applying the Zweifel approach. This holds for both the predicted static skyline tensile force, for which a deviation of −3.5 % to +12.7 % was measured (root mean square error [RMSE] = 7 kN), and for the deflection, which deviated from measured values by −0.73 m to +0.9 m (RMSE = 0.5 m). A slight limitation of the implemented Zweifel approach is the missing aspect of the mainline loading, in particular for steep spans.
索场天线上的张力和挠度:测量值与接近悬链线预测值的比较
摘要:基于电缆的技术是陡坡上木材采伐的支柱。为了简化电缆路的设计过程,最近开发了QGIS插件Seilaplan。Seilaplan是专为中欧电缆堆场技术量身定制的,具有立式天际线。为了分析和预测载荷路径和产生的力,Seilaplan采用了接近接触网的Zweifel方法。本研究的目的是验证多跨电缆道路在现实重载条件下的接触网分析(挠度和天际线张力)。主要发现是,对于实际负载配置和电缆道路设置下的实际应用,可以通过应用Zweifel方法获得足够的精度。这适用于预测的静态天际线拉力,测量到的偏差为-3.5%至+12.7%(均方根误差[RMSE]=7 kN),也适用于偏转,其与测量值的偏差为-0.73 m至+0.9 m(均方根偏差=0.5 m)。Zweifel方法的一个小限制是主线荷载的缺失,尤其是对于陡峭的跨度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
21.10%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信