Effects of different anesthetic techniques on neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and monocyte lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: A prospective, single-blind, randomized study

Q4 Nursing
Priyanka Boruah, B. Gupta, Ajit Kumar, A. Bhadoria, H. Chandra, Rekha Kumari
{"title":"Effects of different anesthetic techniques on neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and monocyte lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: A prospective, single-blind, randomized study","authors":"Priyanka Boruah, B. Gupta, Ajit Kumar, A. Bhadoria, H. Chandra, Rekha Kumari","doi":"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_2_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Various surgical and anesthetic techniques can produce stress. This study aimed to see the changes in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in patients undergoing major surgery at different time points. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled single blinded study was conducted involving 300 patients, scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgeries, randomly grouped into Group 1 (general anesthesia [GA]), Group 2 (total intravenous anesthesia [TIVA]), and Group 3 (combined spinal and epidural [CSE]). Blood samples were collected for NLR and MLR (preoperatively, end-of-surgery, 6 and 24 h after surgery). Results: There was an increase in NLR in all three groups and increase in mean NLR was highest in group GA at the end of the surgery, 6 and 24 h after surgery. The mean comparison of NLR at 6 and 24 h after surgery was also found to be significant when comparison was made between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.001), and between groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.001); however, the difference was found to be insignificant when comparison was made between groups 2 and 3. Conclusion: The mean comparison of NLR at 24 h after surgery was found to be significant when comparison was made between GA and TIVA, GA and CSE; however, the difference was insignificant between-TIVA and CSE groups. Highest rise in the mean NLR 24 h after surgery was found in patients who underwent surgeries under GA than TIVA followed by neuraxial blockade.","PeriodicalId":8691,"journal":{"name":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_2_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Various surgical and anesthetic techniques can produce stress. This study aimed to see the changes in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in patients undergoing major surgery at different time points. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled single blinded study was conducted involving 300 patients, scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgeries, randomly grouped into Group 1 (general anesthesia [GA]), Group 2 (total intravenous anesthesia [TIVA]), and Group 3 (combined spinal and epidural [CSE]). Blood samples were collected for NLR and MLR (preoperatively, end-of-surgery, 6 and 24 h after surgery). Results: There was an increase in NLR in all three groups and increase in mean NLR was highest in group GA at the end of the surgery, 6 and 24 h after surgery. The mean comparison of NLR at 6 and 24 h after surgery was also found to be significant when comparison was made between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.001), and between groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.001); however, the difference was found to be insignificant when comparison was made between groups 2 and 3. Conclusion: The mean comparison of NLR at 24 h after surgery was found to be significant when comparison was made between GA and TIVA, GA and CSE; however, the difference was insignificant between-TIVA and CSE groups. Highest rise in the mean NLR 24 h after surgery was found in patients who underwent surgeries under GA than TIVA followed by neuraxial blockade.
不同麻醉技术对非心脏大手术患者中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率和单核细胞淋巴细胞比率的影响:一项前瞻性、单盲、随机研究
背景:各种手术和麻醉技术都会产生压力。本研究旨在观察大手术患者在不同时间点中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)的变化。材料和方法:进行了一项前瞻性随机对照单盲研究,涉及300名计划进行选择性非心脏手术的患者,随机分为第1组(全身麻醉[GA])、第2组(全静脉麻醉[TIVA])和第3组(脊髓和硬膜外联合[CSE])。采集NLR和MLR的血样(术前、手术结束、6和24 手术后h)。结果:所有三组的NLR都有所增加,手术结束时,GA组的平均NLR增加幅度最高,分别为6和24 手术后h。NLR在6和24时的平均比较 当在第1组和第2组之间以及在第1和第3组之间进行比较时,术后h也被发现是显著的(P=0.001);然而,当在第2组和第3组之间进行比较时,发现差异是不显著的。结论:24岁时NLR的平均值比较 当比较GA和TIVA、GA和CSE时,发现术后h具有显著性;但TIVA组与CSE组间差异不显著。平均NLR的最高增幅24 在GA下接受手术的患者中,发现术后h比在TIVA下接受神经轴阻滞的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信