Innovative data in communities and crime research: an example at the intersection of racial segregation, neighborhood permeability, and crime

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
C. Harris, G. Drawve, Shaun A. Thomas, J. Datta, Hannah Steinman
{"title":"Innovative data in communities and crime research: an example at the intersection of racial segregation, neighborhood permeability, and crime","authors":"C. Harris, G. Drawve, Shaun A. Thomas, J. Datta, Hannah Steinman","doi":"10.1080/0735648X.2022.2044887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Amidst the proliferation of community- and place-based, several innovative measurement tools have become more readily available for criminological and criminal justice researchers. The current study illustrates the utility of two novel data sources – Google transportation data and municipal infrastructure files – as a means of extending studies focused on racial and ethnic segregation’s effect on crime to include critical insights from environmental criminology regarding neighborhood boundary permeability. In doing so, we utilize data from over 120 block groups in Little Rock, Arkansas that include measures of Black isolation and boundary permeability: walk times to adjacent neighborhoods and thru streets captured in city infrastructure files. Our findings reveal that both segregation and neighborhood boundary permeability affect crime independently and net of key structural and spatial covariates, but that boundary permeability conditions the effect of segregation on crime. We conclude by discussing how the integration of newer and under-utilized measurement tools advances long-standing research on segregation and crime by operationalizing key theoretical concepts that have remained difficult to include using more standard secondary databases","PeriodicalId":46770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crime & Justice","volume":"45 1","pages":"609 - 626"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crime & Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2022.2044887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Amidst the proliferation of community- and place-based, several innovative measurement tools have become more readily available for criminological and criminal justice researchers. The current study illustrates the utility of two novel data sources – Google transportation data and municipal infrastructure files – as a means of extending studies focused on racial and ethnic segregation’s effect on crime to include critical insights from environmental criminology regarding neighborhood boundary permeability. In doing so, we utilize data from over 120 block groups in Little Rock, Arkansas that include measures of Black isolation and boundary permeability: walk times to adjacent neighborhoods and thru streets captured in city infrastructure files. Our findings reveal that both segregation and neighborhood boundary permeability affect crime independently and net of key structural and spatial covariates, but that boundary permeability conditions the effect of segregation on crime. We conclude by discussing how the integration of newer and under-utilized measurement tools advances long-standing research on segregation and crime by operationalizing key theoretical concepts that have remained difficult to include using more standard secondary databases
社区和犯罪研究中的创新数据:种族隔离、社区渗透性和犯罪交叉点的一个例子
摘要随着基于社区和地点的测量工具的普及,犯罪学和刑事司法研究人员更容易获得几种创新的测量工具。目前的研究表明,谷歌交通数据和市政基础设施文件这两种新数据源是一种扩展研究种族和族裔隔离对犯罪影响的手段,包括环境犯罪学对社区边界渗透性的关键见解。在这样做的过程中,我们利用了来自阿肯色州小石城120多个街区组的数据,其中包括黑人隔离和边界渗透性的测量:城市基础设施文件中记录的前往邻近社区和穿过街道的步行时间。我们的研究结果表明,隔离和邻域边界渗透性都独立地影响犯罪,并且不包括关键的结构和空间协变量,但边界渗透性决定了隔离对犯罪的影响。最后,我们讨论了新的和未充分利用的衡量工具的整合如何通过使用更标准的二级数据库来操作仍然难以纳入的关键理论概念,从而推进对种族隔离和犯罪的长期研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Crime & Justice
Journal of Crime & Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信