Structuralist Pedagogy, Style, and Composition Studies: Past Paradigms' Unfinished Possibilities

IF 0.5 2区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

STYLE Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.5325/style.56.3.0237

Daniel J. Healy

引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Structuralism as a working method has not come into contact with the body of compositionist scholarship for quite some time, leading writing studies scholars to conclude that its former place of prominence in the discipline was an empiricist reaction to language's inescapable ambiguity (Crowley), or even a radical mistake counter to the very spirit of hermeneutics (Berthoff). This article takes an archival approach toward excavating composition studies' institutional forums to better map American structuralism's once-central role within a discipline that has long since rejected it. Furthermore, it aims to raise the specter that seemingly dead-end structuralist methodologies—A. J. Greimas' structural semantics (1966/1983, Structural Semantics), Frank DeAngelo's theoretical bridging of structural linguistics, rhetoric, and case grammar ("Generative Stylistics: Between Grammar and Rhetoric," "Notes toward a Semantic Theory of Rhetoric within a Case Grammar Framework")—hold possibilities for linking sentence-level style to whole-text rhetorical meaning in theorizing and teaching writing.

查看原文本刊更多论文

结构主义教育学、风格与构成研究：过去范式未完成的可能性

摘要：结构主义作为一种工作方法已经有很长一段时间没有接触到合成主义学术的主体了，这导致写作研究学者得出结论，它以前在学科中的突出地位是对语言不可避免的歧义的经验主义反应（克劳利），甚至是与解释学精神背道而驰的根本错误（伯托夫）。本文采用档案法挖掘构成研究的制度论坛，以更好地描绘美国结构主义在一个长期以来一直拒绝它的学科中曾经发挥的核心作用。J.Greimas的结构语义学（1966/1983，结构语义学），Frank DeAngelo的结构语言学、修辞学、，和格语法（“生成文体学：语法与修辞之间”，“格语法框架下修辞语义理论的注释”）——在理论化和写作教学中，将句子级风格与全文修辞意义联系起来的可能性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

STYLE Multiple-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Style invites submissions that address questions of style, stylistics, and poetics, including research and theory in discourse analysis, literary and nonliterary genres, narrative, figuration, metrics, rhetorical analysis, and the pedagogy of style. Contributions may draw from such fields as literary criticism, critical theory, computational linguistics, cognitive linguistics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric and writing studies. In addition, Style publishes reviews, review-essays, surveys, interviews, translations, enumerative and annotated bibliographies, and reports on conferences.