Determining farm-scale site-specific monetary values of “soil carbon hotspots” based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions

Q2 Environmental Science
E. Mikhailova, C. Post, M. Schlautman, Gregory C. Post, H. Zurqani
{"title":"Determining farm-scale site-specific monetary values of “soil carbon hotspots” based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions","authors":"E. Mikhailova, C. Post, M. Schlautman, Gregory C. Post, H. Zurqani","doi":"10.1080/23311843.2020.1817289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A “soil carbon hotspot” (SCH) is a geographic area having an abundance of soil carbon, and therefore higher ecosystem services value based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions. Soil organic carbon (SOC), soil inorganic carbon (SIC), and total soil carbon (TSC) are critical data to help identify SCH at the farm scale, but monetary methods of hotspot evaluation are not well defined. This study provides a first of its kind quantitative example of farm-scale monetary value of soil carbon (C), and mapping of SCH based on avoided social cost of CO2 emissions using both Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database and field measurements. The total calculated monetary value for TSC storage at the Willsboro Farm based on the SSURGO database was about 7.3 million U.S. dollars ($7.3 M), compared to $2.8 M based on field data from averaged soil core results. This difference is attributed to variation in soil sampling methodology, laboratory methods of soil C analyses, and depth of reported soil C results. Despite differences in total monetary valuation, observed trends by soil order were often similar for SSURGO versus field methods, with Alfisols typically having the highest total and area-normalized monetary values for SOC, SIC, and TSC. Farm-scale C accounting provides a more detailed spatial resolution of monetary values and SCH, compared to estimates based on country-level reports in soil survey databases. Delineation and mapping of SCH at the farm scale can be useful tools to define land management zones, to achieve social profit for farmers, and to realize United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) based on avoided social cost of CO2 emissions.","PeriodicalId":45615,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23311843.2020.1817289","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2020.1817289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract A “soil carbon hotspot” (SCH) is a geographic area having an abundance of soil carbon, and therefore higher ecosystem services value based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions. Soil organic carbon (SOC), soil inorganic carbon (SIC), and total soil carbon (TSC) are critical data to help identify SCH at the farm scale, but monetary methods of hotspot evaluation are not well defined. This study provides a first of its kind quantitative example of farm-scale monetary value of soil carbon (C), and mapping of SCH based on avoided social cost of CO2 emissions using both Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database and field measurements. The total calculated monetary value for TSC storage at the Willsboro Farm based on the SSURGO database was about 7.3 million U.S. dollars ($7.3 M), compared to $2.8 M based on field data from averaged soil core results. This difference is attributed to variation in soil sampling methodology, laboratory methods of soil C analyses, and depth of reported soil C results. Despite differences in total monetary valuation, observed trends by soil order were often similar for SSURGO versus field methods, with Alfisols typically having the highest total and area-normalized monetary values for SOC, SIC, and TSC. Farm-scale C accounting provides a more detailed spatial resolution of monetary values and SCH, compared to estimates based on country-level reports in soil survey databases. Delineation and mapping of SCH at the farm scale can be useful tools to define land management zones, to achieve social profit for farmers, and to realize United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) based on avoided social cost of CO2 emissions.
基于避免的二氧化碳排放社会成本确定“土壤碳热点”的农场规模特定地点货币价值
摘要“土壤碳热点”(SCH)是一个具有丰富土壤碳的地理区域,因此基于避免的二氧化碳排放的社会成本,具有更高的生态系统服务价值。土壤有机碳(SOC)、土壤无机碳(SIC)和土壤总碳(TSC)是帮助在农场规模上识别SCH的关键数据,但热点评估的货币方法尚未得到很好的定义。这项研究提供了第一个农场规模土壤碳(C)货币价值的定量例子,并使用土壤调查地理(SSURGO)数据库和实地测量,基于避免的二氧化碳排放社会成本绘制了SCH图。根据SSURGO数据库,Willsboro农场TSC储存的总计算货币价值约为730万美元(730万美元),而根据平均土壤岩芯结果的现场数据,这一数字为280万美元。这种差异归因于土壤取样方法、土壤C分析的实验室方法以及报告的土壤C结果的深度的变化。尽管总货币估值存在差异,但SSURGO与实地方法按土壤顺序观察到的趋势往往相似,Alfisols通常具有最高的SOC、SIC和TSC的总货币值和面积归一化货币值。与土壤调查数据库中基于国家一级报告的估计相比,农场规模的C核算提供了货币价值和SCH的更详细的空间分辨率。在农场规模上划定和绘制SCH可以成为定义土地管理区、为农民实现社会利润以及在避免二氧化碳排放的社会成本的基础上实现联合国可持续发展目标的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cogent Environmental Science
Cogent Environmental Science ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信