Strengthening Students’ Employability Skills: The Development and First Evaluation of Multiple Approaches to Group Work

Salomien Boshoff
{"title":"Strengthening Students’ Employability Skills: The Development and First Evaluation of Multiple Approaches to Group Work","authors":"Salomien Boshoff","doi":"10.1921/GPWK.V28I2.1218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graduates are not always ready for the workplace, and higher education lecturers are expected to develop students’ employability skills. Group work is perceived to be an effective way to develop these skills. It is not clear, however, what types of group work are most effective for strengthening the business management student’s readiness for the workplace. Three approaches to group work were developed and implemented, namely, 1. A self-allocated group that worked together outside the classroom; 2. A random lecturer-allocated group that only undertook in-class activities; and 3. A pair that worked on a long-term community-service project. The article provides detail on the theoretical underpinnings, the application of the theory and a small-scale exploration of the perceived impact of the integrated approach. In an improvement-oriented evaluation study, business management graduates completed an open-ended questionnaire six months after starting employment. The findings suggest that integrating the three approaches in one module has the potential to improve different aspects of students’ employability skills. The insights gained from the implementation of the approach and the study could serve to guide lecturers in similar environments on how to design/plan group work in order to improve different employability skills.","PeriodicalId":91690,"journal":{"name":"Groupwork : an interdisciplinary journal for working with groups","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groupwork : an interdisciplinary journal for working with groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/GPWK.V28I2.1218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graduates are not always ready for the workplace, and higher education lecturers are expected to develop students’ employability skills. Group work is perceived to be an effective way to develop these skills. It is not clear, however, what types of group work are most effective for strengthening the business management student’s readiness for the workplace. Three approaches to group work were developed and implemented, namely, 1. A self-allocated group that worked together outside the classroom; 2. A random lecturer-allocated group that only undertook in-class activities; and 3. A pair that worked on a long-term community-service project. The article provides detail on the theoretical underpinnings, the application of the theory and a small-scale exploration of the perceived impact of the integrated approach. In an improvement-oriented evaluation study, business management graduates completed an open-ended questionnaire six months after starting employment. The findings suggest that integrating the three approaches in one module has the potential to improve different aspects of students’ employability skills. The insights gained from the implementation of the approach and the study could serve to guide lecturers in similar environments on how to design/plan group work in order to improve different employability skills.
强化学生的就业能力:多元小组作业方法的发展与初步评价
毕业生并不总是为工作做好准备,高等教育讲师需要培养学生的就业能力。小组工作被认为是发展这些技能的有效途径。然而,目前尚不清楚什么类型的小组工作对加强商业管理专业学生的工作准备最有效。制定并实施了三种小组工作方法,即1。一个自我分配的小组,在教室外一起工作;2.随机分配一组只进行课堂活动的讲师;和3。一对长期从事社区服务项目的夫妇。这篇文章详细介绍了理论基础、理论应用以及对综合方法感知影响的小规模探索。在一项以改进为导向的评估研究中,工商管理专业毕业生在开始工作六个月后完成了一份开放式问卷调查。研究结果表明,将这三种方法整合在一个模块中有可能提高学生就业能力的不同方面。从实施该方法和研究中获得的见解可以指导类似环境中的讲师如何设计/规划小组工作,以提高不同的就业能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信