{"title":"Gestus and Taboo: A Study of Bertolt Brecht","authors":"Luka Benedičič","doi":"10.51937/amfiteater-2022-1/316-329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper addresses Brecht’s concept of Gestus and proposes an original reading of it, \nparallel to Roland Barthes’s semiological theory. It proposes the view that a gesture \nbecomes a Gestus when it is interpellated into myth. It follows that the Gestus also \ninterpellates into relations, which is, at the same time, its connecting and disconnecting \npower. The author presents some insights from the theory of ritual and unpacks them to \nidentify some of the ritual’s key characteristics that simultaneously correspond to Brecht’s \nepic theatre. He does this with an awareness of the ontological differences between ritual \nand theatre and without the intention of locating Brechtian theatre at any specific locus in \nthe ritual-theatre relation. He intends to think about this relation so that it reveals further \ninsights into the conceptual and practical nature of Brecht’s estrangement effect. Finally, \nthe author recognises its experimental and pedagogical power in its persistent, repetitive \nintervention in social myths and taboos, which is not only a matter of method but also a \nmatter of initiating in and practising a specific ontology.","PeriodicalId":34446,"journal":{"name":"Amfiteater","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amfiteater","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51937/amfiteater-2022-1/316-329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper addresses Brecht’s concept of Gestus and proposes an original reading of it,
parallel to Roland Barthes’s semiological theory. It proposes the view that a gesture
becomes a Gestus when it is interpellated into myth. It follows that the Gestus also
interpellates into relations, which is, at the same time, its connecting and disconnecting
power. The author presents some insights from the theory of ritual and unpacks them to
identify some of the ritual’s key characteristics that simultaneously correspond to Brecht’s
epic theatre. He does this with an awareness of the ontological differences between ritual
and theatre and without the intention of locating Brechtian theatre at any specific locus in
the ritual-theatre relation. He intends to think about this relation so that it reveals further
insights into the conceptual and practical nature of Brecht’s estrangement effect. Finally,
the author recognises its experimental and pedagogical power in its persistent, repetitive
intervention in social myths and taboos, which is not only a matter of method but also a
matter of initiating in and practising a specific ontology.