Can Systematic Reviews Be Automated?

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/15424065.2022.2113350

Gregory Laynor

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract It can take a year or more to complete a high-quality systematic review. Automation tools have the potential to expedite the systematic review process, but could compromise review quality if not adequately evaluated. International collaborations have begun to address the need to evaluate, improve, and integrate systematic review automation tools. The librarian role in systematic reviews may shift from expert searcher to systematic review automation expert.

查看原文本刊更多论文

系统审查可以自动化吗？

摘要完成一篇高质量的系统综述可能需要一年或更长时间。自动化工具有可能加快系统审查过程，但如果没有充分评估，可能会影响审查质量。国际合作已经开始解决评估、改进和集成系统审查自动化工具的需求。图书馆员在系统综述中的角色可能会从专家搜索者转变为系统综述自动化专家。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries is a peer-reviewed professional journal devoted to the access, evaluation, and management of electronic resources in the medical library environment. This journal will be an essential resource for academic medical school libraries, hospital libraries, and other health sciences libraries. The material in the Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries will complement articles published in Medical Reference Services Quarterly (also edited by M. Sandra Wood), which highlights the reference and bibliographic instruction aspects of electronic resources.