Buccal cortical bone thickness in different sagittal skeletal relationship

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nagham M. Al-Jaf , Rohaya Megat Abdul Wahab , Mohamed Ibrahim Abu Hassan
{"title":"Buccal cortical bone thickness in different sagittal skeletal relationship","authors":"Nagham M. Al-Jaf ,&nbsp;Rohaya Megat Abdul Wahab ,&nbsp;Mohamed Ibrahim Abu Hassan","doi":"10.1016/j.odw.2018.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span><span>To assess buccal cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process in the </span>maxilla<span> and mandible in subjects with different skeletal relationship as an aid in </span></span>orthodontic miniscrew placement.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p><span>The study was carried out using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 94 adult subjects with skeletal Class I, II or III sagittal relationship and normal mandibular plane angle. Buccal cortical bone thickness was obtained at the alveolar processes from canine to second molar at 2 different vertical levels (6, and 8</span> <span>mm) from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse differences in cortical bone thickness.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The difference in mean values of buccal Cortical thickness was significant between the three skeletal classes in both arches and all sites except for the site between first and second mandibular molars (P</span> <!-->&lt;<!--> <span>0.05). In the mandible, buccal cortical plate was thickest between first and second molar in all skeletal classes. In the maxilla, the highest cortical bone thickness for Class I subjects was between first and second molar, for Class II subjects was between canine and first premolar, and for Class III subjects was between first and second premolar. Mandibular measurements increase apically and posteriorly in all skeletal classes.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Buccal cortical bone thickness could be influenced by skeletal relationship. The mandible shows a similar pattern for all skeletal classes. In the maxilla each skeletal relationship shows a different pattern. Skeletal relationship need to be considered in site choice for miniscrew placement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43169,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Waves","volume":"77 4","pages":"Pages 220-225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.odw.2018.08.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Waves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344024118300098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose

To assess buccal cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process in the maxilla and mandible in subjects with different skeletal relationship as an aid in orthodontic miniscrew placement.

Materials and methods

The study was carried out using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 94 adult subjects with skeletal Class I, II or III sagittal relationship and normal mandibular plane angle. Buccal cortical bone thickness was obtained at the alveolar processes from canine to second molar at 2 different vertical levels (6, and 8 mm) from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse differences in cortical bone thickness.

Results

The difference in mean values of buccal Cortical thickness was significant between the three skeletal classes in both arches and all sites except for the site between first and second mandibular molars (P < 0.05). In the mandible, buccal cortical plate was thickest between first and second molar in all skeletal classes. In the maxilla, the highest cortical bone thickness for Class I subjects was between first and second molar, for Class II subjects was between canine and first premolar, and for Class III subjects was between first and second premolar. Mandibular measurements increase apically and posteriorly in all skeletal classes.

Conclusions

Buccal cortical bone thickness could be influenced by skeletal relationship. The mandible shows a similar pattern for all skeletal classes. In the maxilla each skeletal relationship shows a different pattern. Skeletal relationship need to be considered in site choice for miniscrew placement.

不同矢状面骨关系的颊皮质骨厚度
目的探讨不同骨骼关系的上颌、下颌骨牙槽突颊皮质骨厚度的变化,为正畸微型支架的定位提供依据。材料与方法采用锥束ct (cone-beam computed tomography, CBCT)对94例成年受试者进行研究,这些受试者骨骼呈I、II、III类矢状关系,下颌平面角正常。从牙髓-牙釉质接合处(CEJ),在2个不同的垂直水平(6和8 mm)测量从犬齿到第二磨牙的牙槽突的颊皮质骨厚度。方差分析(ANOVA)用于分析皮质骨厚度的差异。结果除第一下颌磨牙与第二下颌磨牙之间外,两牙弓三骨类间颊皮质厚度均值差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05)。在所有骨骼类别中,下颌第一磨牙和第二磨牙之间的颊皮质板最厚。在上颌骨中,第一类受试者的最高皮质骨厚度在第一和第二磨牙之间,第二类受试者的最高皮质骨厚度在犬齿和第一前臼齿之间,第三类受试者的最高皮质骨厚度在第一和第二前臼齿之间。在所有骨骼类别中,下颌测量值在顶端和后方增加。结论口腔皮质骨厚度受骨缘关系的影响。下颌骨在所有骨骼类别中都显示出相似的模式。在上颌骨中,每一种骨骼关系都显示出不同的模式。在选择微型支架放置的位置时,需要考虑骨骼关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthodontic Waves
Orthodontic Waves DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Orthodontic Waves is the official publication of the Japanese Orthodontic Society. The aim of this journal is to foster the advancement of orthodontic research and practice. The journal seeks to publish original articles (i) definitive reports of wide interest to the orthodontic community, (ii) Case Reports and (iii) Short Communications. Research papers stand on the scientific basis of orthodontics. Clinical topics covered include all techniques and approaches to treatment planning. All submissions are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信