The Cybernetics of Hoodoo Divination

IF 0.5 Q4 ETHNIC STUDIES
James Padilioni
{"title":"The Cybernetics of Hoodoo Divination","authors":"James Padilioni","doi":"10.1080/00064246.2022.2079068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I t is an undeniable feature of twenty-first century life that our robust digital sphere has shrunk the vastness of spacetime, enabling information to traverse the globe at the speed of light, necessitating reorientations to the way social groups relate and sustain themselves across physical and cyber domains. These transformations have impacted the arena of religious practice as well, where “online and offline” sites of gathering and worship “have become blended or integrated,” particularly driven by the proliferation of social media and streaming video services. As such, discourses of the Digital Age often highlight the “newness” of digital cultures in distinction from “outdated” analog cultures. But scholars addressing the intersection of Black religion and digital religion must take care not to replicate the overarching presumption that digital technology is actually something new. The sensibility that likens technological novelty with improvement is nothing other than a reinstantiation of the technoscientific myth of progress, which first emerged during the Rationalist Revolution of the seventeenth century and reached a zenith during the Industrial Age of the nineteenth century. Positing the West as the terminal direction of Time’s flow, the chronotopic focal point where History’s dialectical struggle would culminate with Enlightenment, this Eurocentric imagination justified the colonial subjugation of the indigenous peoples of the Americas, Africa, and Asia on account of their “primitive” nature. And while the literal and figurative fallout from mid-twentieth-century nuclear warfare greatly reduced the persuasive power of this myth, the emergence of Internet culture at the dawning of the new millennium revived humanist hope that technology might save us from our postmodern condition. In his landmark critique of historiography, James Snead revealed the colonial stigma of deeming Africans “outside” History has no meaningful coordinate without a linear temporal frame of reference that separates time into discrete units, and cordons off those time units already-experienced as the past, from those units of ongoing time we acclaim the present, and the succession of anticipated-impending time units called the future. The Africanist disavowal of historical time makes it impossible to declare the faculty of African temporal perception as behind that of the European. Rather, “the African is also always already there, or perhaps always there before, whereas the European is headed there or, better, not yet there.” Thus, while Enlightenment conceit espouses “there is no repetition in culture ... only... difference, defined as progress and growth,” Black culture contains an “organizing principle of repetition” that structures one’s “perception of repetition, precisely by highlighting that perception.” From Snead’s description of Blackness-as-organized repetition, I generate the corollary notion Blackness-as-algorithmic. Specifically, I argue that Hoodoo divination rituals harness the","PeriodicalId":45369,"journal":{"name":"BLACK SCHOLAR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BLACK SCHOLAR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2022.2079068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I t is an undeniable feature of twenty-first century life that our robust digital sphere has shrunk the vastness of spacetime, enabling information to traverse the globe at the speed of light, necessitating reorientations to the way social groups relate and sustain themselves across physical and cyber domains. These transformations have impacted the arena of religious practice as well, where “online and offline” sites of gathering and worship “have become blended or integrated,” particularly driven by the proliferation of social media and streaming video services. As such, discourses of the Digital Age often highlight the “newness” of digital cultures in distinction from “outdated” analog cultures. But scholars addressing the intersection of Black religion and digital religion must take care not to replicate the overarching presumption that digital technology is actually something new. The sensibility that likens technological novelty with improvement is nothing other than a reinstantiation of the technoscientific myth of progress, which first emerged during the Rationalist Revolution of the seventeenth century and reached a zenith during the Industrial Age of the nineteenth century. Positing the West as the terminal direction of Time’s flow, the chronotopic focal point where History’s dialectical struggle would culminate with Enlightenment, this Eurocentric imagination justified the colonial subjugation of the indigenous peoples of the Americas, Africa, and Asia on account of their “primitive” nature. And while the literal and figurative fallout from mid-twentieth-century nuclear warfare greatly reduced the persuasive power of this myth, the emergence of Internet culture at the dawning of the new millennium revived humanist hope that technology might save us from our postmodern condition. In his landmark critique of historiography, James Snead revealed the colonial stigma of deeming Africans “outside” History has no meaningful coordinate without a linear temporal frame of reference that separates time into discrete units, and cordons off those time units already-experienced as the past, from those units of ongoing time we acclaim the present, and the succession of anticipated-impending time units called the future. The Africanist disavowal of historical time makes it impossible to declare the faculty of African temporal perception as behind that of the European. Rather, “the African is also always already there, or perhaps always there before, whereas the European is headed there or, better, not yet there.” Thus, while Enlightenment conceit espouses “there is no repetition in culture ... only... difference, defined as progress and growth,” Black culture contains an “organizing principle of repetition” that structures one’s “perception of repetition, precisely by highlighting that perception.” From Snead’s description of Blackness-as-organized repetition, I generate the corollary notion Blackness-as-algorithmic. Specifically, I argue that Hoodoo divination rituals harness the
胡杜占卜的控制论
21世纪生活的一个不可否认的特点是,我们强大的数字领域缩小了浩瀚的时空,使信息能够以光速穿越全球,这就需要重新调整社会群体在物理和网络领域的联系和维持方式。这些转变也影响了宗教实践领域,“线上和线下”的聚会和礼拜场所“已经混合或融合”,特别是在社交媒体和流媒体视频服务激增的推动下。因此,数字时代的话语经常强调数字文化的“新颖性”,区别于“过时的”模拟文化。但研究黑人宗教和数字宗教交叉点的学者必须注意,不要复制数字技术实际上是新事物的总体假设。将技术的新颖性与进步相提并论的感性,无非是对技术科学进步神话的再现,这种神话最早出现在17世纪的理性主义革命期间,并在19世纪的工业时代达到顶峰。这种以欧洲为中心的想象将西方定位为时间流动的终点,历史的辩证斗争将在启蒙运动中达到高潮,这为美洲、非洲和亚洲土著人民因其“原始”性质而被殖民征服辩护。尽管20世纪中期核战争的文字和形象影响大大削弱了这个神话的说服力,但新千年伊始互联网文化的出现重新唤起了人文主义者的希望,即技术可能会将我们从后现代状态中拯救出来。詹姆斯·斯奈德在其具有里程碑意义的史学批判中揭示了将非洲人视为“外部”的殖民污名。如果没有将时间划分为离散单位的线性时间参照系,历史就没有有意义的坐标,并将那些已经作为过去经历的时间单位与那些我们称赞现在的持续时间单位隔离开来,以及被称为未来的一系列预期即将到来的时间单位。非洲主义者对历史时间的否定使得不可能宣称非洲的时间感知能力落后于欧洲人。相反,“非洲人也总是在那里,或者可能以前一直在那里,而欧洲人正在那里,或者更好的是,还没有。”因此,启蒙运动的自负主张“文化中没有重复……只有……差异,定义为进步和成长”,而黑人文化包含一种“重复的组织原则”,它通过强调这种感知来构建一个人的“重复感知”,我生成了“黑色”作为算法的推论概念。具体来说,我认为Hoodoo占卜仪式利用了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BLACK SCHOLAR
BLACK SCHOLAR ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Founded in 1969 and hailed by The New York Times as "a journal in which the writings of many of today"s finest black thinkers may be viewed," THE BLACK SCHOLAR has firmly established itself as the leading journal of black cultural and political thought in the United States. In its pages African American studies intellectuals, community activists, and national and international political leaders come to grips with basic issues confronting black America and Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信