Ways of meaning

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Neda Karimi, A. Moore, Annabelle Lukin
{"title":"Ways of meaning","authors":"Neda Karimi, A. Moore, Annabelle Lukin","doi":"10.1075/langct.00024.kar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores one aspect of the operationalisation of a patient-centred ideology of care by examining an\n oncologist’s answers to questions asked by her patient and his companion during a palliative oncology consultation and comparing her answers\n to the markedly different answers of another oncologist. Halliday’s concept of register and Hasan’s semantic networks are used to examine\n the oncologists’ answers. Patients’ questions create the semiotic environment for clinicians to provide the information patients need for\n informed decision-making – an important aspect of patient-centredness. The answers clinicians provide construe their position towards this\n ideology of care. Findings suggest that one way patient-centredness can be operationalised, at the level of semantics, is through providing\n elaborated answers that explicitly display the reasoning employed by the oncologist.","PeriodicalId":29846,"journal":{"name":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00024.kar","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper explores one aspect of the operationalisation of a patient-centred ideology of care by examining an oncologist’s answers to questions asked by her patient and his companion during a palliative oncology consultation and comparing her answers to the markedly different answers of another oncologist. Halliday’s concept of register and Hasan’s semantic networks are used to examine the oncologists’ answers. Patients’ questions create the semiotic environment for clinicians to provide the information patients need for informed decision-making – an important aspect of patient-centredness. The answers clinicians provide construe their position towards this ideology of care. Findings suggest that one way patient-centredness can be operationalised, at the level of semantics, is through providing elaborated answers that explicitly display the reasoning employed by the oncologist.
意义的方式
本文通过检查肿瘤学家在姑息肿瘤学咨询期间对患者及其同伴提出的问题的回答,并将她的回答与另一位肿瘤学家明显不同的回答进行比较,探讨了以患者为中心的护理思想的实施的一个方面。韩礼德的语域概念和哈桑的语义网络被用来检验肿瘤学家的答案。患者的问题为临床医生创造了符号环境,为患者提供知情决策所需的信息——这是以患者为中心的一个重要方面。临床医生提供的答案解释了他们对这种护理意识形态的立场。研究结果表明,在语义层面上,以患者为中心的一种方法是提供详细的答案,明确显示肿瘤学家所采用的推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信