Safety and Efficacy of Collagen-Based Biological Dressings in the Management of Chronic Superficial Skin Wounds in Non-Complex Trauma: A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

F. De Francesco, Marialuisa De Francesco, M. Riccio
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Collagen-Based Biological Dressings in the Management of Chronic Superficial Skin Wounds in Non-Complex Trauma: A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study","authors":"F. De Francesco, Marialuisa De Francesco, M. Riccio","doi":"10.3390/traumacare1030017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biological dressings such as collagen and hyaluronic acid represent the main advanced tools that plastic surgeons, dermatologists and vulnologists use today to treat chronic wounds or ulcers that do not tend to heal. These types of dressings are important because they create a moist and physiological interface at the wound level, are of natural origin, easy to use, hypo-allergenic, economical and do not create discomfort for the patient during dressing changes. We treated 128 patients (divided into four groups based on type of dressing) with non-complex superficial chronic wounds in comparison with a traditional dressing (fitostimoline gauze or polyurethane foam). We analyzed wound characteristics, healing time, and operator and patient satisfaction. A significantly higher recovery rate was observed in the “Collagen-coated plates” treatment group compared to Standard Treatment. Additionally, a significantly higher probability of recovery was observed compared to the alternative two experimental devices (Collagen-coated plates + HA and Collagen-based spray). However, the main limitation of the randomization of this study is the presence in the “Collagen-based spray” group of localized wounds, mainly in the fingers and hand. No side effects were reported in relation to the procedures or the experimental products. Collagen may be considered as a valuable therapeutic tool in non-complex chronic wounds by virtue of its low immunogenicity, flexibility and applicability in biocompatible scaffolds, and represents driving force toward enhanced wound care.","PeriodicalId":75251,"journal":{"name":"Trauma care (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma care (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare1030017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Biological dressings such as collagen and hyaluronic acid represent the main advanced tools that plastic surgeons, dermatologists and vulnologists use today to treat chronic wounds or ulcers that do not tend to heal. These types of dressings are important because they create a moist and physiological interface at the wound level, are of natural origin, easy to use, hypo-allergenic, economical and do not create discomfort for the patient during dressing changes. We treated 128 patients (divided into four groups based on type of dressing) with non-complex superficial chronic wounds in comparison with a traditional dressing (fitostimoline gauze or polyurethane foam). We analyzed wound characteristics, healing time, and operator and patient satisfaction. A significantly higher recovery rate was observed in the “Collagen-coated plates” treatment group compared to Standard Treatment. Additionally, a significantly higher probability of recovery was observed compared to the alternative two experimental devices (Collagen-coated plates + HA and Collagen-based spray). However, the main limitation of the randomization of this study is the presence in the “Collagen-based spray” group of localized wounds, mainly in the fingers and hand. No side effects were reported in relation to the procedures or the experimental products. Collagen may be considered as a valuable therapeutic tool in non-complex chronic wounds by virtue of its low immunogenicity, flexibility and applicability in biocompatible scaffolds, and represents driving force toward enhanced wound care.
胶原生物敷料治疗非复杂创伤慢性浅表皮肤损伤的安全性和有效性:上市后监测研究
胶原蛋白和透明质酸等生物敷料是整形外科医生、皮肤科医生和外阴科医生今天用来治疗无法愈合的慢性伤口或溃疡的主要先进工具。这些类型的敷料很重要,因为它们在伤口水平上创造了一个潮湿的生理界面,来源于自然,易于使用,低过敏性,经济实惠,并且在换药过程中不会给患者带来不适。与传统敷料(fitostimoline纱布或聚氨酯泡沫)相比,我们治疗了128例非复杂浅表慢性伤口患者(根据敷料类型分为四组)。我们分析了伤口特征、愈合时间、操作人员和患者满意度。与标准治疗相比,“胶原涂层板”治疗组的恢复率明显更高。此外,与替代的两种实验装置(胶原涂层板+HA和胶原基喷雾)相比,观察到明显更高的回收概率。然而,本研究随机化的主要局限性是“胶原蛋白喷雾”组存在局部伤口,主要是手指和手部。未报告与手术或实验产品有关的副作用。胶原蛋白由于其在生物相容性支架中的低免疫原性、灵活性和适用性,可被认为是非复杂慢性伤口的一种有价值的治疗工具,并代表着加强伤口护理的推动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信