{"title":"Design Thinking as a Complement to Human Factors Engineering for Enhancing Medical Device Usability","authors":"T. Saidi, C. Mutswangwa, T. Douglas","doi":"10.1080/19378629.2019.1567521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Medical devices are indispensable in the diagnosis, treatment and management of disease. To enhance the usability of medical devices, human factors engineering (HFE) has been widely applied. While it takes into account human capabilities and limitations, the use of HFE in the design of medical devices has challenges that render its implementation incomplete, resulting in its potential not being fully exploited. This study examines the literature on HFE to identify gaps and review recommendations with regard to its application in the design of medical devices. The literature reveals that HFE tends to place emphasis on the reduction of errors at the expense of medical device usability, that it has challenges in drawing on multiple perspectives, that it provides limited space for creativity and innovation, that it does not give adequate attention to contextual factors, and that communication barriers interfere with its implementation. The literature suggests that the shortcomings of HFE are methodological. To fill the gap, we propose the use of design thinking in HFE, not as a substitute but as a complementary approach, for enhancing usability. Design thinking, by virtue of being a human-centered approach, has the potential to add value to HFE by incorporating the subjective components of usability.","PeriodicalId":49207,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"34 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19378629.2019.1567521","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Studies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2019.1567521","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
ABSTRACT Medical devices are indispensable in the diagnosis, treatment and management of disease. To enhance the usability of medical devices, human factors engineering (HFE) has been widely applied. While it takes into account human capabilities and limitations, the use of HFE in the design of medical devices has challenges that render its implementation incomplete, resulting in its potential not being fully exploited. This study examines the literature on HFE to identify gaps and review recommendations with regard to its application in the design of medical devices. The literature reveals that HFE tends to place emphasis on the reduction of errors at the expense of medical device usability, that it has challenges in drawing on multiple perspectives, that it provides limited space for creativity and innovation, that it does not give adequate attention to contextual factors, and that communication barriers interfere with its implementation. The literature suggests that the shortcomings of HFE are methodological. To fill the gap, we propose the use of design thinking in HFE, not as a substitute but as a complementary approach, for enhancing usability. Design thinking, by virtue of being a human-centered approach, has the potential to add value to HFE by incorporating the subjective components of usability.
Engineering StudiesENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Engineering Studies is an interdisciplinary, international journal devoted to the scholarly study of engineers and engineering. Its mission is threefold:
1. to advance critical analysis in historical, social, cultural, political, philosophical, rhetorical, and organizational studies of engineers and engineering;
2. to help build and serve diverse communities of researchers interested in engineering studies;
3. to link scholarly work in engineering studies with broader discussions and debates about engineering education, research, practice, policy, and representation.
The editors of Engineering Studies are interested in papers that consider the following questions:
• How does this paper enhance critical understanding of engineers or engineering?
• What are the relationships among the technical and nontechnical dimensions of engineering practices, and how do these relationships change over time and from place to place?