Setback distance and management for wetlands in plantation forests – a review of policy and practice in Australia and New Zealand

Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00049158.2022.2073741
B. Myers, E. G. Jones, J. O'Hehir, J. Lawson
{"title":"Setback distance and management for wetlands in plantation forests – a review of policy and practice in Australia and New Zealand","authors":"B. Myers, E. G. Jones, J. O'Hehir, J. Lawson","doi":"10.1080/00049158.2022.2073741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The management of wetlands within plantation forests is important for compliance with forest and timber certification schemes and legal requirements. This review considers how setback vegetation and management has been prescribed in policy, codes and guidelines in Australia and New Zealand, focusing on setback and buffer distances, why they are prescribed, and the evidence provided on their benefit. Our findings indicate that, although prescriptive guidance is generally provided for the establishment of setbacks and buffers, there is a lack of guidance on, for example, what vegetation should be in the setback or buffer zone and how it should be managed. There is also a lack of evidence in codes of practice, guidelines and policies to support the specified prescriptive distances. Requirements and recommendations should be evidence-based and assessed for effectiveness; where this knowledge is lacking, further studies should be undertaken to provide an evidence base.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2022.2073741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The management of wetlands within plantation forests is important for compliance with forest and timber certification schemes and legal requirements. This review considers how setback vegetation and management has been prescribed in policy, codes and guidelines in Australia and New Zealand, focusing on setback and buffer distances, why they are prescribed, and the evidence provided on their benefit. Our findings indicate that, although prescriptive guidance is generally provided for the establishment of setbacks and buffers, there is a lack of guidance on, for example, what vegetation should be in the setback or buffer zone and how it should be managed. There is also a lack of evidence in codes of practice, guidelines and policies to support the specified prescriptive distances. Requirements and recommendations should be evidence-based and assessed for effectiveness; where this knowledge is lacking, further studies should be undertaken to provide an evidence base.
分享
查看原文
人工林湿地的后退距离和管理——澳大利亚和新西兰政策和实践综述
摘要人工林内湿地的管理对于遵守森林和木材认证计划和法律要求非常重要。本次审查考虑了澳大利亚和新西兰的政策、规范和指南中对后退植被和管理的规定,重点是后退和缓冲距离,规定它们的原因,以及提供的关于其益处的证据。我们的研究结果表明,尽管通常为建立后退和缓冲区提供了规范性的指导,但缺乏关于后退或缓冲区内的植被以及如何管理的指导。实践守则、指导方针和政策中也缺乏支持特定规定距离的证据。要求和建议应以证据为基础,并对其有效性进行评估;在缺乏这些知识的地方,应该进行进一步的研究,以提供证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信