The effectiveness of positive behaviour support in reducing challenging behaviour and increasing quality of life for individuals with intellectual disability

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
K. Dewey, Sean Evans, Sarah Horsley, Ellis Baker
{"title":"The effectiveness of positive behaviour support in reducing challenging behaviour and increasing quality of life for individuals with intellectual disability","authors":"K. Dewey, Sean Evans, Sarah Horsley, Ellis Baker","doi":"10.1108/amhid-03-2023-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIntensive support teams (ISTs) are often poorly understood, despite reports of their effectiveness in managing behaviour that challenges for individuals with an intellectual disability. This paper aims to contribute to the understanding of ISTs through evaluating one IST’s process and their use of positive behaviour support (PBS) as an intervention.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nParticipants were obtained from the ISTs discharge database, and pre- and post-intervention data from these participants was used for analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThree-paired sample t-tests found that there were significant differences between pre- and post-scores on the behaviour problem inventory, Health of the Nation Outcomes Scale for people with Learning Disabilities and periodic service reviews, which measure quality of targeted, individualised support. This indicates that challenging behaviour frequency and severity were lower post-intervention, quality of life improved post-intervention and staff teams implemented recommended strategies more consistently by the end of the intervention.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis service evaluation captured data over seven-year period, which helps to contribute to the understanding of the effectiveness of ISTs and the PBS framework.\n","PeriodicalId":44693,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-03-2023-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Intensive support teams (ISTs) are often poorly understood, despite reports of their effectiveness in managing behaviour that challenges for individuals with an intellectual disability. This paper aims to contribute to the understanding of ISTs through evaluating one IST’s process and their use of positive behaviour support (PBS) as an intervention. Design/methodology/approach Participants were obtained from the ISTs discharge database, and pre- and post-intervention data from these participants was used for analysis. Findings Three-paired sample t-tests found that there were significant differences between pre- and post-scores on the behaviour problem inventory, Health of the Nation Outcomes Scale for people with Learning Disabilities and periodic service reviews, which measure quality of targeted, individualised support. This indicates that challenging behaviour frequency and severity were lower post-intervention, quality of life improved post-intervention and staff teams implemented recommended strategies more consistently by the end of the intervention. Originality/value This service evaluation captured data over seven-year period, which helps to contribute to the understanding of the effectiveness of ISTs and the PBS framework.
积极行为支持在减少智力残疾患者的挑战性行为和提高生活质量方面的有效性
目的强化支持团队(IST)通常不太为人所知,尽管有报道称其在管理智障患者行为方面的有效性。本文旨在通过评估IST的过程及其使用积极行为支持(PBS)作为干预措施,有助于理解IST。设计/方法/方法从ISTs出院数据库中获得参与者,并使用这些参与者的干预前和干预后数据进行分析。结果三项配对样本t检验发现,在行为问题清单、学习障碍者国家健康结果量表和定期服务审查(衡量有针对性的个性化支持的质量)的前后得分之间存在显著差异。这表明,干预后具有挑战性的行为频率和严重程度较低,干预后生活质量得到改善,工作人员团队在干预结束时更一致地实施了建议的策略。独创性/价值这项服务评估收集了七年的数据,有助于理解IST和PBS框架的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信