Abstraction in storytelling

IF 0.9 4区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Stephen Pihlaja
{"title":"Abstraction in storytelling","authors":"Stephen Pihlaja","doi":"10.1075/ni.22045.pih","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Discussions of storytelling and narrative have encompassed abstraction in different ways including master\n narratives (Bamberg, 1997) and storylines (Harré\n & van Lagenhove, 1998). These discussions, however, have often viewed storytelling and abstraction as a binary\n distinction, rather than a spectrum where speakers move between different levels of abstraction when recounting experiences. This\n article argues for a nuanced approach to abstraction in storytelling that considers how specific details of stories – namely,\n actors, actions, contexts, and time – are excluded or abstracted in the recounting of experience, with a link between increased\n abstraction and implied moral judgement. The article first outlines the theoretical basis for this argument, and then shows\n specific examples of abstraction taken from stories about religious experience. Finally, the productive implications of a nuanced\n view of abstraction are outlined, including for narrative and discourse analysis, for understanding of storytelling and cognition,\n and for critical analysis of racist language.","PeriodicalId":46671,"journal":{"name":"Narrative Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narrative Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22045.pih","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discussions of storytelling and narrative have encompassed abstraction in different ways including master narratives (Bamberg, 1997) and storylines (Harré & van Lagenhove, 1998). These discussions, however, have often viewed storytelling and abstraction as a binary distinction, rather than a spectrum where speakers move between different levels of abstraction when recounting experiences. This article argues for a nuanced approach to abstraction in storytelling that considers how specific details of stories – namely, actors, actions, contexts, and time – are excluded or abstracted in the recounting of experience, with a link between increased abstraction and implied moral judgement. The article first outlines the theoretical basis for this argument, and then shows specific examples of abstraction taken from stories about religious experience. Finally, the productive implications of a nuanced view of abstraction are outlined, including for narrative and discourse analysis, for understanding of storytelling and cognition, and for critical analysis of racist language.
讲故事中的抽象
关于讲故事和叙事的讨论以不同的方式包括抽象,包括大师叙事(Bamberg,1997)和故事情节(Harré和van Lagenhove,1998)。然而,这些讨论通常将讲故事和抽象视为二元区别,而不是说话者在讲述经历时在不同抽象层次之间移动的光谱。这篇文章主张在讲故事中采用一种微妙的抽象方法,考虑故事的具体细节——即演员、动作、背景和时间——在讲述经验时是如何被排除或抽象的,并在增加的抽象性和隐含的道德判断之间建立联系。文章首先概述了这一论点的理论基础,然后展示了从宗教经历故事中抽象出来的具体例子。最后,概述了细致入微的抽象观的生产意义,包括叙事和话语分析,对讲故事和认知的理解,以及对种族主义语言的批判性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Narrative Inquiry
Narrative Inquiry Multiple-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Narrative Inquiry is devoted to providing a forum for theoretical, empirical, and methodological work on narrative. Articles appearing in Narrative Inquiry draw upon a variety of approaches and methodologies in the study of narrative as a way to give contour to experience, tradition, and values to next generations. Particular emphasis is placed on theoretical approaches to narrative and the analysis of narratives in human interaction, including those practiced by researchers in psychology, linguistics and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信