Multi-criteria decision support system for selecting the rainwater harvesting technique in wadi systems, Sinai, Egypt

IF 1.6 Q3 WATER RESOURCES
M. Abdelkader, U. Mahmoud, A. Mobasher, M. Reda
{"title":"Multi-criteria decision support system for selecting the rainwater harvesting technique in wadi systems, Sinai, Egypt","authors":"M. Abdelkader, U. Mahmoud, A. Mobasher, M. Reda","doi":"10.2166/wpt.2023.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recently, some areas are exposed to water scarcity and floods, and rainwater harvesting (RWH) is a practical solution, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. The Wadi Watier basin located in South Sinai, Egypt was selected to identify the appropriate RWH techniques. Five alternatives were proposed: a dam with a reservoir, a storage pond, an underground tank, wadi bed cultivation, or a Jessor system. The hydrological model was built using the WMS software to determine the runoff volume at the proposed RWH sites. Multiple criteria were identified and classified based on their suitability degree. Then, an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to assign the effective weight of each evaluation criterion. The AHP revealed that the wadi slope and initial cost have the highest evaluation influence of 20%, followed by the wadi width of 15%. The rainfall volume, social acceptance, and cost revenue have moderate influences with weights from 8 to 11%. Finally, the storage ponds and underground tanks recorded the highest suitability evaluations at the selected RWH sites, at 65.4 and 62.7%, respectively. The dam with a reservoir recorded 49.3%, which is considered medium suitability, while wadi bed cultivation and Jessor systems were classified as low suitability evaluations with 42.7 and 41.7%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":23794,"journal":{"name":"Water Practice and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Practice and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2023.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recently, some areas are exposed to water scarcity and floods, and rainwater harvesting (RWH) is a practical solution, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. The Wadi Watier basin located in South Sinai, Egypt was selected to identify the appropriate RWH techniques. Five alternatives were proposed: a dam with a reservoir, a storage pond, an underground tank, wadi bed cultivation, or a Jessor system. The hydrological model was built using the WMS software to determine the runoff volume at the proposed RWH sites. Multiple criteria were identified and classified based on their suitability degree. Then, an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to assign the effective weight of each evaluation criterion. The AHP revealed that the wadi slope and initial cost have the highest evaluation influence of 20%, followed by the wadi width of 15%. The rainfall volume, social acceptance, and cost revenue have moderate influences with weights from 8 to 11%. Finally, the storage ponds and underground tanks recorded the highest suitability evaluations at the selected RWH sites, at 65.4 and 62.7%, respectively. The dam with a reservoir recorded 49.3%, which is considered medium suitability, while wadi bed cultivation and Jessor systems were classified as low suitability evaluations with 42.7 and 41.7%, respectively.
埃及西奈,瓦迪系统雨水收集技术选择的多标准决策支持系统
最近,一些地区面临缺水和洪水,雨水收集是一个切实可行的解决方案,尤其是在干旱和半干旱地区。选择位于埃及西奈半岛南部的Wadi Watier盆地来确定适当的RWH技术。提出了五种替代方案:一个带水库的大坝、一个储水池、一个地下水箱、瓦迪河床养殖或杰索尔系统。使用WMS软件建立水文模型,以确定拟建RWH站点的径流量。根据其适用程度确定并分类了多个标准。然后,采用层次分析法(AHP)对各评价标准进行有效权重分配。层次分析法显示,河道坡度和初始成本的评价影响最大,为20%,其次是河道宽度,为15%。降雨量、社会接受度和成本收入具有中等影响,权重在8%至11%之间。最后,在选定的RWH场地,储存池和地下储罐的适用性评价最高,分别为65.4%和62.7%。有水库的大坝记录了49.3%的适宜性,被认为是中等适宜性,而瓦迪河床栽培和Jessor系统被归类为低适宜性评价,分别为42.7%和41.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
136
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信