Improving the Allocation of Indirect Costs Using the FABC Method (Based on the Example of a Paper and Cardboard Manufacturing Company)

Ermina Liubinaitė, Ieva Lipskytė
{"title":"Improving the Allocation of Indirect Costs Using the FABC Method (Based on the Example of a Paper and Cardboard Manufacturing Company)","authors":"Ermina Liubinaitė, Ieva Lipskytė","doi":"10.15388/batp.2023.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every enterprise seeks to determine as accurately as possible the cost of the products or services it produces. The allocation of indirect costs causes considerable difficulties in this process. In the search for the most accurate alternatives for allocating indirect costs, the Activity Based Costing (ABC) method has become more popular in recent decades and is increasingly used by companies. The ABC method has many advantages, but it also has disadvantages, which have led to further development of the method by proposing newer versions. These include Fuzzy Activity Based Costing (FABC), which reduces the risk of uncertainty in data collection conditions and inaccurate cost allocation. However, while the literature provides a theoretical model of the FABC approach, there is very little research focused on sector-specific companies. Given that the issue of indirect cost allocation is particularly relevant for manufacturing companies, this paper explores the possibilities of applying the FABC method in manufacturing companies, using the example of a paper and cardboard manufacturing company. The aim of the research: after revealing the principles of ABC and FABC implementation, to improve the indirect cost allocation process in a paper and cardboard manufacturing company using the FABC method. The methods used for the study were document analysis, observation, conversation, interview, and fuzzy set analysis. The results showed that the FABC method has lower cost drivers for some activities and higher cost drivers for others than the ABC method. The improvement path developed for the allocation of indirect costs using the FABC approach could serve as a good model for its implementation in other manufacturing sectors.","PeriodicalId":52857,"journal":{"name":"Buhalterines Apskaitos Teorija ir Praktika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buhalterines Apskaitos Teorija ir Praktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/batp.2023.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every enterprise seeks to determine as accurately as possible the cost of the products or services it produces. The allocation of indirect costs causes considerable difficulties in this process. In the search for the most accurate alternatives for allocating indirect costs, the Activity Based Costing (ABC) method has become more popular in recent decades and is increasingly used by companies. The ABC method has many advantages, but it also has disadvantages, which have led to further development of the method by proposing newer versions. These include Fuzzy Activity Based Costing (FABC), which reduces the risk of uncertainty in data collection conditions and inaccurate cost allocation. However, while the literature provides a theoretical model of the FABC approach, there is very little research focused on sector-specific companies. Given that the issue of indirect cost allocation is particularly relevant for manufacturing companies, this paper explores the possibilities of applying the FABC method in manufacturing companies, using the example of a paper and cardboard manufacturing company. The aim of the research: after revealing the principles of ABC and FABC implementation, to improve the indirect cost allocation process in a paper and cardboard manufacturing company using the FABC method. The methods used for the study were document analysis, observation, conversation, interview, and fuzzy set analysis. The results showed that the FABC method has lower cost drivers for some activities and higher cost drivers for others than the ABC method. The improvement path developed for the allocation of indirect costs using the FABC approach could serve as a good model for its implementation in other manufacturing sectors.
用FABC方法改进间接成本的分配(以一家纸和纸板制造公司为例)
每个企业都力求尽可能准确地确定其生产的产品或服务的成本。间接费用的分配在这一过程中造成了相当大的困难。在寻找分配间接成本的最准确替代方案的过程中,作业成本法(ABC)在近几十年来变得越来越流行,并越来越多地被公司使用。ABC方法有很多优点,但也有缺点,这导致了该方法的进一步发展,提出了新的版本。其中包括模糊作业成本法(FABC),它降低了数据收集条件的不确定性和不准确的成本分配的风险。然而,尽管文献提供了FABC方法的理论模型,但很少有针对特定行业公司的研究。鉴于间接成本分配问题与制造企业特别相关,本文以纸张和纸板制造企业为例,探讨了在制造企业中应用FABC方法的可能性。本研究的目的是:在揭示ABC和FABC实施原理的基础上,利用FABC方法改进一家纸和纸板制造公司的间接成本分配过程。研究采用文献分析、观察、对话、访谈和模糊集分析等方法。结果表明,与ABC方法相比,FABC方法对某些活动具有较低的成本动因,而对其他活动具有较高的成本动因。使用FABC方法为间接成本分配制定的改进路径可以作为在其他制造业实施该方法的良好模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信