Do Emerging Trends in Climate Litigation Signal a Potential Cause of Action in Negligence against Corporations by the Australian Public?

IF 0.9 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
T. Popa, A. Kallies, Vanessa Johnston, Gabriella Belfrage-Maher
{"title":"Do Emerging Trends in Climate Litigation Signal a Potential Cause of Action in Negligence against Corporations by the Australian Public?","authors":"T. Popa, A. Kallies, Vanessa Johnston, Gabriella Belfrage-Maher","doi":"10.1163/18786561-12030001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over the past two decades a global jurisprudential trend of domestic climate litigation against governments and companies has emerged. One avenue for litigation against these entities is tort law. The tort of negligence could provide access to compensation for aggrieved individuals and groups. Using the example of Australia, this article discusses whether the emergence of climate tort cases, an increasing drive to hold corporations responsible for climate change, and a company focus on voluntary climate action, could lead to the emergence of a new duty of care by corporate actors toward non-shareholders. We highlight opportunities and barriers to the further development of negligence law as a cause of action against corporations for harms related to climate change.","PeriodicalId":38485,"journal":{"name":"Climate Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-12030001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past two decades a global jurisprudential trend of domestic climate litigation against governments and companies has emerged. One avenue for litigation against these entities is tort law. The tort of negligence could provide access to compensation for aggrieved individuals and groups. Using the example of Australia, this article discusses whether the emergence of climate tort cases, an increasing drive to hold corporations responsible for climate change, and a company focus on voluntary climate action, could lead to the emergence of a new duty of care by corporate actors toward non-shareholders. We highlight opportunities and barriers to the further development of negligence law as a cause of action against corporations for harms related to climate change.
气候诉讼的新趋势是否预示着澳大利亚公众对公司疏忽的潜在诉讼原因?
在过去的二十年里,针对政府和公司的国内气候诉讼的全球法学趋势已经出现。对这些实体提起诉讼的一个途径是侵权法。过失侵权可以为受害的个人和群体提供获得赔偿的途径。本文以澳大利亚为例,讨论了气候侵权案件的出现、越来越多地要求公司对气候变化负责,以及公司专注于自愿气候行动,是否会导致公司行为者对非股东承担新的注意义务。我们强调了进一步发展疏忽法的机会和障碍,将其作为针对与气候变化有关的危害的公司的诉讼理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Climate Law
Climate Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信