Bureaucratizing non-government organizations as governmental forest extension services in social forestry policy in Indonesia

IF 1.1 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
S. Rahayu, D. Laraswati, A. A. Pratama, M. Sahide, D. Permadi, W. Wibowo, T. S. Widyaningsih, E.S.M. Suprapto, W. Andayani, A. Maryudi
{"title":"Bureaucratizing non-government organizations as governmental forest extension services in social forestry policy in Indonesia","authors":"S. Rahayu, D. Laraswati, A. A. Pratama, M. Sahide, D. Permadi, W. Wibowo, T. S. Widyaningsih, E.S.M. Suprapto, W. Andayani, A. Maryudi","doi":"10.1080/14728028.2020.1753585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The government of Indonesia is ambitiously planning for more expansion of social forestry with a target of 12.7 million ha of state land to be distributed to local communities through several permit-based social forestry schemes. To deliver the target, the central forest bureaucracy issued a new forest extension policy, which enables non-government organizations (NGOs) to get involved in government extension services. This short commentary analyses aspects related to the coordination and synergies between government agencies and NGOs to achieve their common goals in extension activities. NGOs possess strengths as an agent of community development programs with technical and organizational expertise and experience in mobilizing communities. However, given their contrasted characteristics in terms of organizational settings, goals and objectives, there are challenges facing NGOs when partnering with government institutions. They may face rigid and demanding bureaucratic procedures, and complex coordination.","PeriodicalId":12422,"journal":{"name":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","volume":"29 1","pages":"119 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14728028.2020.1753585","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2020.1753585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

ABSTRACT The government of Indonesia is ambitiously planning for more expansion of social forestry with a target of 12.7 million ha of state land to be distributed to local communities through several permit-based social forestry schemes. To deliver the target, the central forest bureaucracy issued a new forest extension policy, which enables non-government organizations (NGOs) to get involved in government extension services. This short commentary analyses aspects related to the coordination and synergies between government agencies and NGOs to achieve their common goals in extension activities. NGOs possess strengths as an agent of community development programs with technical and organizational expertise and experience in mobilizing communities. However, given their contrasted characteristics in terms of organizational settings, goals and objectives, there are challenges facing NGOs when partnering with government institutions. They may face rigid and demanding bureaucratic procedures, and complex coordination.
印度尼西亚社会林业政策中非政府组织作为政府森林推广服务机构的官僚主义
摘要印度尼西亚政府雄心勃勃地计划进一步扩大社会林业,目标是通过几个基于许可证的社会林业计划,将1270万公顷的国有土地分配给当地社区。为了实现这一目标,中央森林官僚机构发布了一项新的森林推广政策,使非政府组织能够参与政府的推广服务。这篇简短的评论分析了与政府机构和非政府组织之间的协调和协同作用有关的方面,以实现其在推广活动中的共同目标。非政府组织作为社区发展计划的代理人,在动员社区方面具有技术和组织专业知识和经验,具有优势。然而,鉴于非政府组织在组织设置、目标和目的方面的对比特征,非政府组织与政府机构合作时面临挑战。他们可能面临严格而苛刻的官僚程序和复杂的协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Forests, Trees and Livelihoods originated in 1979 under the name of the International Tree Crops Journal and adopted its new name in 2001 in order to reflect its emphasis on the diversity of tree based systems within the field of rural development. It is a peer-reviewed international journal publishing comments, reviews, case studies, research methodologies and research findings and articles on policies in this general field in order to promote discussion, debate and the exchange of information and views in the main subject areas of.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信