Applying the Housing First approach to single-site permanent supportive housing

IF 1.1 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
A. Montgomery, Sonya Gabrielian, Meagan C. Cusack, E. Austin, S. Kertesz, Jesse K. Vazzano
{"title":"Applying the Housing First approach to single-site permanent supportive housing","authors":"A. Montgomery, Sonya Gabrielian, Meagan C. Cusack, E. Austin, S. Kertesz, Jesse K. Vazzano","doi":"10.1080/10530789.2018.1546796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explored how the U.S. Departments of Housing and Urban Development-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program applies Housing First principles in the context of ten single-site programs. Focus group discussions with 64 HUD-VASH staff and community partners explored how the programs were influenced by Housing First principles and specific strategies to implement these principles in a single-site setting. Focus group respondents described resourceful ways that the principles of Housing First were implemented in their programs specifically related to (1) housing choice and structure, (2) separation of housing and services, (3) service philosophy, and (4) service array. Several of the Housing First domains cite the importance of integrated housing and the provision of services off-site; it was of particular interest to learn how single-site programs address these issues logistically. Lessons learned from this study include the importance of leveraging the independent yet overlapping tasks of case management and property management to ensure functional – if not geographic – separation of housing and services; maintaining staff on-site to address Veterans’ needs; working with community service organizations to complement the array of service available to residents; and housing single-site programs in mixed-use buildings.","PeriodicalId":45390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10530789.2018.1546796","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10530789.2018.1546796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explored how the U.S. Departments of Housing and Urban Development-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program applies Housing First principles in the context of ten single-site programs. Focus group discussions with 64 HUD-VASH staff and community partners explored how the programs were influenced by Housing First principles and specific strategies to implement these principles in a single-site setting. Focus group respondents described resourceful ways that the principles of Housing First were implemented in their programs specifically related to (1) housing choice and structure, (2) separation of housing and services, (3) service philosophy, and (4) service array. Several of the Housing First domains cite the importance of integrated housing and the provision of services off-site; it was of particular interest to learn how single-site programs address these issues logistically. Lessons learned from this study include the importance of leveraging the independent yet overlapping tasks of case management and property management to ensure functional – if not geographic – separation of housing and services; maintaining staff on-site to address Veterans’ needs; working with community service organizations to complement the array of service available to residents; and housing single-site programs in mixed-use buildings.
将住房优先方法应用于单点永久性支持性住房
摘要本研究探讨了美国住房和城市发展部退伍军人事务支持性住房(HUD-VASH)计划如何在十个单点计划的背景下应用住房优先原则。与64名HUD-VASH工作人员和社区合作伙伴进行的焦点小组讨论探讨了这些项目如何受到住房优先原则的影响,以及在单一地点实施这些原则的具体战略。焦点小组受访者描述了住房优先原则在其项目中的实施方式,具体涉及(1)住房选择和结构,(2)住房和服务分离,(3)服务理念,以及(4)服务阵列。住房优先的几个领域提到了综合住房和提供场外服务的重要性;了解单站点程序如何从逻辑上解决这些问题特别令人感兴趣。从这项研究中吸取的经验教训包括,利用案件管理和财产管理这两项独立但重叠的任务,确保住房和服务在功能上(如果不是地理上)分离的重要性;维持现场工作人员以满足退伍军人的需求;与社区服务组织合作,补充向居民提供的一系列服务;以及在混合用途建筑中容纳单点项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信