Imperial Genealogies and Ottoman Nobility in Republican Turkey: Reassessing the Distinction Between Public and Private Archives

IF 0.2 4区历史学 Q2 HISTORY

Turkish Historical Review Pub Date : 2022-10-07 DOI:10.1163/18775462-bja10045

O. Bouquet

引用次数: 0

Abstract

As Grand Vizier from 1782 to 1785, Halil Hamid Pasha established a pious foundation (vakif) in 1783. Administered by his descendants, the foundation gave impetus to various forms of family genealogy in the last two centuries. Celal Bükey and his son Erol Bükey administered the foundation (tevliyet) from 1973 to 1981 and from 1992 to 2002 respectively. Using their personal documents, the article studies the way father and son handled the various symbolic materials they had inherited from their predecessors in order to transform an ancien régime lineage into a republican dynasty organized through new family memorial references. Underlining the extent to which family archives need to be addressed as a cumulative process of preserving documents as deeds that legally guarantee ownership, the article also reassesses the line usually drawn by scholars between private papers and public archives.

查看原文本刊更多论文

帝国家谱与土耳其共和国的奥斯曼贵族身份——兼论公共档案与私人档案的区别

作为1782年至1785年的大维齐尔，哈利尔·哈米德·帕夏在1783年建立了一个虔诚的基金会（vakif）。该基金会由他的后代管理，在过去的两个世纪里推动了各种形式的家谱。Celal Bükey和他的儿子Erol Bükey分别于1973年至1981年和1992年至2002年管理该基金会（tevliyet）。文章利用他们的个人文件，研究了父子俩如何处理他们从前任那里继承的各种象征性材料，以将一个古老的制度谱系转变为一个通过新的家族纪念文献组织起来的共和王朝。文章强调了家庭档案在多大程度上需要作为一个累积的过程来处理，将文件作为法律上保证所有权的契约来保存，并重新评估了学者通常在私人文件和公共档案之间划定的界限。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Turkish Historical Review HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Turkish Historical Review is devoted to Turkish history in the widest sense, covering the period from the 6th century, with the rise of the Turks in Central Asia, to the 20th century. All contributions to the journal must display a substantial use of primary-source material and also be accessible to historians in general, i.e. those working outside the specific fields of Ottoman and Turkish history. Articles with a comparative scope which cross the traditional boundaries of the area studies paradigm are therefore very welcome. The editors also encourage younger scholars to submit contributions. The journal includes a reviews section, which, in addition to publications in English, French, and other western European languages, will specifically monitor new studies in Turkish and those coming out in the Balkans, Russia and the Middle East. The Turkish Historical Review has a double-blind peer review system.