{"title":"India's Troubled Relations with Kathmandu: Nepal's Republican Turn and the China Factor","authors":"Pramod K. Kantha","doi":"10.1353/gss.2021.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article analyzes factors behind the rapid deterioration of India–Nepal relations since September 2015, when Nepal's Constituent Assembly adopted a new constitution. Nepal's Madhesis, roughly 30 percent of Nepal's population, concentrated in the southern plain region, rejected the constitution, as it did not address the grievances against which they had been protesting. The Madhesi demands were also supported by India. In fast-tracking the adoption of the constitution, Nepal's major party leaders had also shunned India's advice. India escalated by imposing an economic blockade on landlocked Nepal from the major transit points along the India-Nepal border; Nepal called it an unjustified \"blockade.\" Kathmandu, in turn, moved closer to India's top rival, China, to thwart the Indian pressure. China's role has continued to rise after India opened the transit points in early 2016. Nepal's relations with India took a further plunge in 2020 as Nepal objected to the inclusion of some of Nepal's westernmost areas in India's revised map. Nepal's post-monarchy politics and China's leveraging of its economic and political strength to grow its influence in Nepal have raised new challenges to the hitherto dominant role that India has historically played. India's growing strategic closeness to the United States further complicates Nepal's relations with its influential neighbors. The historic tendency on the part of Nepal's political leaders to seek foreign support in their factional and interparty rivalries has further widened the scope for external meddling.","PeriodicalId":37496,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global South Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"314 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global South Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gss.2021.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:This article analyzes factors behind the rapid deterioration of India–Nepal relations since September 2015, when Nepal's Constituent Assembly adopted a new constitution. Nepal's Madhesis, roughly 30 percent of Nepal's population, concentrated in the southern plain region, rejected the constitution, as it did not address the grievances against which they had been protesting. The Madhesi demands were also supported by India. In fast-tracking the adoption of the constitution, Nepal's major party leaders had also shunned India's advice. India escalated by imposing an economic blockade on landlocked Nepal from the major transit points along the India-Nepal border; Nepal called it an unjustified "blockade." Kathmandu, in turn, moved closer to India's top rival, China, to thwart the Indian pressure. China's role has continued to rise after India opened the transit points in early 2016. Nepal's relations with India took a further plunge in 2020 as Nepal objected to the inclusion of some of Nepal's westernmost areas in India's revised map. Nepal's post-monarchy politics and China's leveraging of its economic and political strength to grow its influence in Nepal have raised new challenges to the hitherto dominant role that India has historically played. India's growing strategic closeness to the United States further complicates Nepal's relations with its influential neighbors. The historic tendency on the part of Nepal's political leaders to seek foreign support in their factional and interparty rivalries has further widened the scope for external meddling.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Global South Studies focuses on the countries and peoples of the "global south," including those in Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, and parts of Oceania. The global south is not, however, synonymous with geographic locations in the southern hemisphere. That is, some of these countries and peoples are situated in the northern hemisphere. The journal solicits high-quality, academic papers on a broad range of issues and topics affecting these countries and peoples. Such papers may address questions involving politics, history, economics, culture, social organization, legal systems, agriculture, the environment, global institutions and systems, justice, and more. The journal aims to promote a wider and better understanding of our world and its peoples. The Journal of Global South Studies is the official journal of the Association of Global South Studies.